Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The kernel function and its hyperparameters are the central model selection choice in a Gaussian proces (Rasmussen and Williams, 2006). Typically, the hyperparameters of the kernel are chosen by maximising the marginal likelihood, an approach known as Type-II maximum likelihood (ML-II). However, ML-II does not account for hyperparameter uncertainty, and it is well-known that this can lead to severely biased estimates and an underestimation of predictive uncertainty. While there are several works which employ a fully Bayesian characterisation of GPs, relatively few propose such approaches for the sparse GPs paradigm. In this work we propose an algorithm for sparse Gaussian process regression which leverages MCMC to sample from the hyperparameter posterior within the variational inducing point framework of Titsias (2009). This work is closely related to Hensman et al. (2015b) but side-steps the need to sample the inducing points, thereby significantly improving sampling efficiency in the Gaussian likelihood case. We compare this scheme against natural baselines in literature along with stochastic variational GPs (SVGPs) along with an extensive computational analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2022.
Builds on
22 of 42 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 445
- 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 383
- 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
- 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 228
- 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 209
- 2017Doubly Stochastic Variational Inference for Deep Gaussian Processescited by 143
- 2016GPflow: A Gaussian process library using TensorFlowcited by 140
- 2019Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved widehatR for assessing convergence of MCMCcited by 93
- 2021The Promises and Pitfalls of Deep Kernel Learningcited by 81
- 2015On Sparse variational methods and the Kullback-Leibler divergence between stochastic processescited by 57
10 more
- 2020Convergence of Sparse Variational Inference in Gaussian Processes Regressioncited by 53
- 2013Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Hierarchical Modelscited by 52
- 2020A Framework for Interdomain and Multioutput Gaussian Processescited by 48
- 2015MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processescited by 44
- 2017Convolutional Gaussian Processescited by 44
- 2018Inference in Deep Gaussian Processes using Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 32
- 2019Approximate Inference for Fully Bayesian Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 31
- 2018Partitioned Variational Inference: A unified framework encompassing federated and continual learningcited by 29
- 2020Marginalised Gaussian Processes with Nested Samplingcited by 7
- 2013Pseudo-Marginal Bayesian Inference for Gaussian Processescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Fully Bayesian Autoencoders with Latent Sparse Gaussian Processescited by 9
- 2024Fully Bayesian Differential Gaussian Processes through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 4
- 2026Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Datacited by 0
- 2026Occam's Razor is Only as Sharp as Your ELBOcited by 0
- 2026Occam's Razor is Only as Sharp as Your ELBO28 Apr 2026
- 2026Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Data23 Mar 2026
- 2024Fully Bayesian Differential Gaussian Processes through Stochastic Differential Equations12 Aug 2024
- 2023Fully Bayesian Autoencoders with Latent Sparse Gaussian Processes9 Feb 2023