Marginalised Gaussian Processes with Nested Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gaussian Process (GPs) models are a rich distribution over functions with inductive biases controlled by a kernel function. Learning occurs through the optimisation of kernel hyperparameters using the marginal likelihood as the objective. This classical approach known as Type-II maximum likelihood (ML-II) yields point estimates of the hyperparameters, and continues to be the default method for training GPs. However, this approach risks underestimating predictive uncertainty and is prone to overfitting especially when there are many hyperparameters. Furthermore, gradient based optimisation makes ML-II point estimates highly susceptible to the presence of local minima. This work presents an alternative learning procedure where the hyperparameters of the kernel function are marginalised using Nested Sampling (NS), a technique that is well suited to sample from complex, multi-modal distributions. We focus on regression tasks with the spectral mixture (SM) class of kernels and find that a principled approach to quantifying model uncertainty leads to substantial gains in predictive performance across a range of synthetic and benchmark data sets. In this context, nested sampling is also found to offer a speed advantage over Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), widely considered to be the gold-standard in MCMC based inference.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Neural Diffusion Processescited by 50
- 2024Stopping Bayesian Optimization with Probabilistic Regret Boundscited by 11
- 2022Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate?cited by 4
- 2021Validating Gaussian Process Models with Simulation-Based Calibrationcited by 0
- 2024On the Laplace Approximation as Model Selection Criterion for Gaussian Processescited by 0
- 2024A New Reliable & Parsimonious Learning Strategy Comprising Two Layers of Gaussian Processes, to Address Inhomogeneous Empirical Correlation Structurescited by 0
- 2026Automatic Laplace Collapsed Sampling: Scalable Marginalisation of Latent Parameters via Automatic Differentiationcited by 0
- 2026Automatic Laplace Collapsed Sampling: Scalable Marginalisation of Latent Parameters via Automatic Differentiation27 Mar 2026
- 2024A New Reliable & Parsimonious Learning Strategy Comprising Two Layers of Gaussian Processes, to Address Inhomogeneous Empirical Correlation Structures18 Apr 2024
- 2024On the Laplace Approximation as Model Selection Criterion for Gaussian Processes14 Mar 2024
- 2024Stopping Bayesian Optimization with Probabilistic Regret Bounds26 Feb 2024
- 2022Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate?4 Nov 2022
- 2022Neural Diffusion Processes8 Jun 2022
- 2021Validating Gaussian Process Models with Simulation-Based Calibration27 Oct 2021