Improved Adaptive Algorithm for Scalable Active Learning with Weak Labeler
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning with strong and weak labelers considers a practical setting where we have access to both costly but accurate strong labelers and inaccurate but cheap predictions provided by weak labelers. We study this problem in the streaming setting, where decisions must be taken textitonline. We design a novel algorithmic template, Weak Labeler Active Cover (WL-AC), that is able to robustly leverage the lower quality weak labelers to reduce the query complexity while retaining the desired level of accuracy. Prior active learning algorithms with access to weak labelers learn a difference classifier which predicts where the weak labels differ from strong labelers; this requires the strong assumption of realizability of the difference classifier (Zhang and Chaudhuri,2015). WL-AC bypasses this textitrealizability assumption and thus is applicable to many real-world scenarios such as random corrupted weak labels and high dimensional family of difference classifiers (textite.g., deep neural nets). Moreover, WL-AC cleverly trades off evaluating the quality with full exploitation of weak labelers, which allows to convert any active learning strategy to one that can leverage weak labelers. We provide an instantiation of this template that achieves the optimal query complexity for any given weak labeler, without knowing its accuracy a-priori. Empirically, we propose an instantiation of the WL-AC template that can be efficiently implemented for large-scale models (textite.g., deep neural nets) and show its effectiveness on the corrupted-MNIST dataset by significantly reducing the number of labels while keeping the same accuracy as in passive learning.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2022.
Builds on
14 of 31 references.
References · 14
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 262
- 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
- 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
- 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 88
- 2016Crowdsourcing in Computer Visioncited by 31
- 2015Active Learning from Weak and Strong Labelerscited by 22
- 2020Taking a hint: How to leverage loss predictors in contextual bandits?cited by 20
- 2015Efficient and Parsimonious Agnostic Active Learningcited by 17
- 2016Active Learning from Imperfect Labelerscited by 13
2 more
- 2021On Unifying Misinformation Detectioncited by 10
- 2021Top K Ranking for Multi-Armed Bandit with Noisy Evaluationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Improved Algorithm for Deep Active Learning under Imbalance via Optimal Separationcited by 8
- 2025Active Learning with a Noisy Annotatorcited by 3
- 2026An Analysis of Active Learning Algorithms using Real-World Crowd-sourced Text Annotationscited by 0
- 2026Active Learning with Foundation Model Priors: Efficient Learning under Class Imbalancecited by 0
- 2026Active Learning with Foundation Model Priors: Efficient Learning under Class Imbalance30 May 2026
- 2026An Analysis of Active Learning Algorithms using Real-World Crowd-sourced Text Annotations25 Apr 2026
- 2025Active Learning with a Noisy Annotator6 Apr 2025
- 2023Improved Algorithm for Deep Active Learning under Imbalance via Optimal Separation14 Dec 2023