mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Health Disparities in EHR via Deconfounder

arXiv 2210.15901 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Health disparities, or inequalities between different patient demographics, are becoming crucial in medical decision-making, especially in Electronic Health Record (EHR) predictive modeling. To ensure the fairness of sensitive attributes, conventional studies mainly adopt calibration or re-weighting methods to balance the performance on among different demographic groups. However, we argue that these methods have some limitations. First, these methods usually mean a trade-off between the model's performance and fairness. Second, many methods completely attribute unfairness to the data collection process, which lacks substantial evidence. In this paper, we provide an empirical study to discover the possibility of using deconfounder to address the disparity issue in healthcare. Our study can be summarized in two parts. The first part is a pilot study demonstrating the exacerbation of disparity when unobserved confounders exist. The second part proposed a novel framework, Parity Medical Deconfounder (PriMeD), to deal with the disparity issue in healthcare datasets. Inspired by the deconfounder theory, PriMeD adopts a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) to learn latent factors (substitute confounders) for observational data, and extensive experiments are provided to show its effectiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2022.

Builds on

23 of 49 references.

References · 23

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  5. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  6. 2018Scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health recordscited by 275
  7. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  8. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  9. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  10. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  11. 2020Ethical Machine Learning in Health Carecited by 112
  12. 2018The Blessings of Multiple Causescited by 103
11 more
  1. 2020Robust Fairness under Covariate Shiftcited by 58
  2. 2019Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classificationcited by 55
  3. 2018A Moral Framework for Understanding of Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunitycited by 53
  4. 2018Residual Unfairness in Fair Machine Learning from Prejudiced Datacited by 49
  5. 2020An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 45
  6. 2019The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured Confoundingcited by 35
  7. 2018Fairness GANcited by 32
  8. 2021RadFusion: Benchmarking Performance and Fairness for Multimodal Pulmonary Embolism Detection from CT and EHRcited by 32
  9. 2019Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 28
  10. 2021Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcarecited by 21
  11. 2020Towards Clarifying the Theory of the Deconfoundercited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

7 papers.