mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Searching Dense Point Correspondences via Permutation Matrix Learning

arXiv 2210.14897 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although 3D point cloud data has received widespread attentions as a general form of 3D signal expression, applying point clouds to the task of dense correspondence estimation between 3D shapes has not been investigated widely. Furthermore, even in the few existing 3D point cloud-based methods, an important and widely acknowledged principle, i.e . one-to-one matching, is usually ignored. In response, this paper presents a novel end-to-end learning-based method to estimate the dense correspondence of 3D point clouds, in which the problem of point matching is formulated as a zero-one assignment problem to achieve a permutation matching matrix to implement the one-to-one principle fundamentally. Note that the classical solutions of this assignment problem are always non-differentiable, which is fatal for deep learning frameworks. Thus we design a special matching module, which solves a doubly stochastic matrix at first and then projects this obtained approximate solution to the desired permutation matrix. Moreover, to guarantee end-to-end learning and the accuracy of the calculated loss, we calculate the loss from the learned permutation matrix but propagate the gradient to the doubly stochastic matrix directly which bypasses the permutation matrix during the backward propagation. Our method can be applied to both non-rigid and rigid 3D point cloud data and extensive experiments show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance for dense correspondence learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  3. 2016Geometric deep learning on graphs and manifolds using mixture model CNNscited by 468
  4. 2019Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 321
  5. 2018FlowNet3D: Learning Scene Flow in 3D Point Cloudscited by 242
  6. 2020Deep Global Registrationcited by 229
  7. 2020RPM-Net: Robust Point Matching using Learned Featurescited by 182
  8. 2020D3Feat: Joint Learning of Dense Detection and Description of 3D Local Featurescited by 177
  9. 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 175
  10. 2018The Perfect Match: 3D Point Cloud Matching with Smoothed Densitiescited by 169
  11. 20183D-CODED : 3D Correspondences by Deep Deformationcited by 160
  12. 2019PRNet: Self-Supervised Learning for Partial-to-Partial Registrationcited by 146
10 more
  1. 2017Deep Functional Maps: Structured Prediction for Dense Shape Correspondencecited by 134
  2. 2020Deep Geometric Functional Maps: Robust Feature Learning for Shape Correspondencecited by 125
  3. 2016Learning shape correspondence with anisotropic convolutional neural networkscited by 95
  4. 2018Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structured Shape Matchingcited by 81
  5. 2018Continuous and Orientation-preserving Correspondences via Functional Mapscited by 77
  6. 2020CorrNet3D: Unsupervised End-to-end Learning of Dense Correspondence for 3D Point Cloudscited by 47
  7. 2018IMLS-SLAM: scan-to-model matching based on 3D datacited by 40
  8. 2017Product Manifold Filter: Non-Rigid Shape Correspondence via Kernel Density Estimation in the Product Spacecited by 30
  9. 2017Robust and Precise Vehicle Localization based on Multi-sensor Fusion in Diverse City Scenescited by 24
  10. 2021GA-NET: Global Attention Network for Point Cloud Semantic Segmentationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.