mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation?

arXiv 2210.13700 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2022eess.AS cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, in speech translation, the straightforward approach - cascading a recognition system with a translation system - delivers state-of-the-art results. However, fundamental challenges such as error propagation from the automatic speech recognition system still remain. To mitigate these problems, recently, people turn their attention to direct data and propose various joint training methods. In this work, we seek to answer the question of whether joint training really helps cascaded speech translation. We review recent papers on the topic and also investigate a joint training criterion by marginalizing the transcription posterior probabilities. Our findings show that a strong cascaded baseline can diminish any improvements obtained using joint training, and we suggest alternatives to joint training. We hope this work can serve as a refresher of the current speech translation landscape, and motivate research in finding more efficient and creative ways to utilize the direct data for speech translation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  5. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
  6. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  7. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  8. 2016Joint CTC-Attention based End-to-End Speech Recognition using Multi-task Learningcited by 254
  9. 2020Speech Translation and the End-to-End Promise: Taking Stock of Where We Arecited by 77
  10. 2018End-to-End Automatic Speech Translation of Audiobookscited by 65
  11. 2018Tied Multitask Learning for Neural Speech Translationcited by 54
  12. 2021Stacked Acoustic-and-Textual Encoding: Integrating the Pre-trained Models into Speech Translation Encoderscited by 48
11 more
  1. 2019Bridging the Gap between Pre-Training and Fine-Tuning for End-to-End Speech Translationcited by 39
  2. 2019Multilingual End-to-End Speech Translationcited by 37
  3. 2018Augmenting Librispeech with French Translations: A Multimodal Corpus for Direct Speech Translation Evaluationcited by 34
  4. 2019Attention-Passing Models for Robust and Data-Efficient End-to-End Speech Translationcited by 30
  5. 2021Searchable Hidden Intermediates for End-to-End Models of Decomposable Sequence Taskscited by 24
  6. 2017Neural Lattice-to-Sequence Models for Uncertain Inputscited by 20
  7. 2019On Using SpecAugment for End-to-End Speech Translationcited by 19
  8. 2019Lattice Transformer for Speech Translationcited by 15
  9. 2020Tight Integrated End-to-End Training for Cascaded Speech Translationcited by 13
  10. 2018Structured-based Curriculum Learning for End-to-end English-Japanese Speech Translationcited by 11
  11. 2019LibriVoxDeEn: A Corpus for German-to-English Speech Translation and German Speech Recognitioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.