mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating Neuron Disturbing in Fusing Heterogeneous Neural Networks

arXiv 2210.12974 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fusing deep learning models trained on separately located clients into a global model in a one-shot communication round is a straightforward implementation of Federated Learning. Although current model fusion methods are shown experimentally valid in fusing neural networks with almost identical architectures, they are rarely theoretically analyzed. In this paper, we reveal the phenomenon of neuron disturbing, where neurons from heterogeneous local models interfere with each other mutually. We give detailed explanations from a Bayesian viewpoint combining the data heterogeneity among clients and properties of neural networks. Furthermore, to validate our findings, we propose an experimental method that excludes neuron disturbing and fuses neural networks via adaptively selecting a local model, called AMS, to execute the prediction according to the input. The experiments demonstrate that AMS is more robust in data heterogeneity than general model fusion and ensemble methods. This implies the necessity of considering neural disturbing in model fusion. Besides, AMS is available for fusing models with varying architectures as an experimental algorithm, and we also list several possible extensions of AMS for future work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.

Builds on

24 of 43 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  4. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  5. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  6. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  7. 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
  8. 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 678
  9. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
  10. 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
  11. 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 555
  12. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
12 more
  1. 2019Bayesian Nonparametric Federated Learning of Neural Networkscited by 385
  2. 2021Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 380
  3. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 347
  4. 2019Model Fusion via Optimal Transportcited by 217
  5. 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 196
  6. 2020FedBE: Making Bayesian Model Ensemble Applicable to Federated Learningcited by 176
  7. 2020FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity to Non-IID Datacited by 143
  8. 2019Zero-Shot Knowledge Distillation in Deep Networkscited by 119
  9. 2021Distributionally Robust Federated Averagingcited by 104
  10. 2019Statistical Model Aggregation via Parameter Matchingcited by 17
  11. 2020Model Fusion with Kullback--Leibler Divergencecited by 10
  12. 2018Scalable inference of topic evolution via models for latent geometric structurescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.