mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bridging the Gap Between Target Networks and Functional Regularization

arXiv 2210.12282 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bootstrapping is behind much of the successes of Deep Reinforcement Learning. However, learning the value function via bootstrapping often leads to unstable training due to fast-changing target values. Target Networks are employed to stabilize training by using an additional set of lagging parameters to estimate the target values. Despite the popularity of Target Networks, their effect on the optimization is still misunderstood. In this work, we show that they act as an implicit regularizer. This regularizer has disadvantages such as being inflexible and non convex. To overcome these issues, we propose an explicit Functional Regularization that is a convex regularizer in function space and can easily be tuned. We analyze the convergence of our method theoretically and empirically demonstrate that replacing Target Networks with the more theoretically grounded Functional Regularization approach leads to better sample efficiency and performance improvements.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2022.

Builds on

29 of 61 references.

References · 29

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  6. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  7. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  8. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  9. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  10. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  11. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  12. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
17 more
  1. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  2. 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
  3. 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 262
  4. 2019Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement Learningcited by 262
  5. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 170
  6. 2018Generalization and Regularization in DQNcited by 117
  7. 2015An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 103
  8. 2018Measuring and regularizing networks in function spacecited by 97
  9. 2019Approximate Inference Turns Deep Networks into Gaussian Processescited by 89
  10. 2021Breaking the Deadly Triad with a Target Networkcited by 47
  11. 2019Towards Characterizing Divergence in Deep Q-Learningcited by 43
  12. 2020Gradient Temporal-Difference Learning with Regularized Correctionscited by 38
  13. 2018Relative Entropy Regularized Policy Iterationcited by 32
  14. 2020GRAC: Self-Guided and Self-Regularized Actor-Criticcited by 20
  15. 2020Kalman meets Bellman: Improving Policy Evaluation through Value Trackingcited by 7
  16. 2019Trust Region Value Optimization using Kalman Filteringcited by 6
  17. 2018Natural Gradient Deep Q-learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.