mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Study of Fake News Reading and Annotating in Social Media Context

arXiv 2109.12523 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2021cs.HC cs.CY cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The online spreading of fake news is a major issue threatening entire societies. Much of this spreading is enabled by new media formats, namely social networks and online media sites. Researchers and practitioners have been trying to answer this by characterizing the fake news and devising automated methods for detecting them. The detection methods had so far only limited success, mostly due to the complexity of the news content and context and lack of properly annotated datasets. One possible way to boost the efficiency of automated misinformation detection methods, is to imitate the detection work of humans. It is also important to understand the news consumption behavior of online users. In this paper, we present an eye-tracking study, in which we let 44 lay participants to casually read through a social media feed containing posts with news articles, some of which were fake. In a second run, we asked the participants to decide on the truthfulness of these articles. We also describe a follow-up qualitative study with a similar scenario but this time with 7 expert fake news annotators. We present the description of both studies, characteristics of the resulting dataset (which we hereby publish) and several findings.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2021.

Builds on

3 of 35 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 334
  2. 2018False Information on Web and Social Media: A Surveycited by 33
  3. 2018Fake News Identification on Twitter with Hybrid CNN and RNN Modelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.