Protecting Split Learning by Potential Energy Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a practical privacy-preserving learning method, split learning has drawn much attention in academia and industry. However, its security is constantly being questioned since the intermediate results are shared during training and inference. In this paper, we focus on the privacy leakage from the forward embeddings of split learning. Specifically, since the forward embeddings contain too much information about the label, the attacker can either use a few labeled samples to fine-tune the top model or perform unsupervised attacks such as clustering to infer the true labels from the forward embeddings. To prevent such kind of privacy leakage, we propose the potential energy loss to make the forward embeddings become more 'complicated', by pushing embeddings of the same class towards the decision boundary. Therefore, it is hard for the attacker to learn from the forward embeddings. Experiment results show that our method significantly lowers the performance of both fine-tuning attacks and clustering attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 391
- 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 277
- 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 118
- 2020Feature Inference Attack on Model Predictions in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 105
- 2020Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split Learningcited by 104
- 2015How much does your data exploration overfit? Controlling bias via information usagecited by 95
- 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 87
15 more
- 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
- 2018Generalization Error Bounds for Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 79
- 2020NoPeek: Information leakage reduction to share activations in distributed deep learningcited by 66
- 2020Vertically Federated Graph Neural Network for Privacy-Preserving Node Classificationcited by 61
- 2021UnSplit: Data-Oblivious Model Inversion, Model Stealing, and Label Inference Attacks Against Split Learningcited by 52
- 2020Can We Use Split Learning on 1D CNN Models for Privacy Preserving Training?cited by 50
- 2022BlindFL: Vertical Federated Machine Learning without Peeking into Your Datacited by 36
- 2022Label Leakage and Protection from Forward Embedding in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2019Quantifying the generalization error in deep learning in terms of data distribution and neural network smoothnesscited by 22
- 2022Differential Private Knowledge Transfer for Privacy-Preserving Cross-Domain Recommendationcited by 22
- 2020Communication-Efficient Multimodal Split Learning for mmWave Received Power Predictioncited by 18
- 2021DP-SSL: Towards Robust Semi-supervised Learning with A Few Labeled Samplescited by 18
- 2021ExPLoit: Extracting Private Labels in Split Learningcited by 15
- 2021Spatio-Temporal Split Learning for Privacy-Preserving Medical Platforms: Case Studies with COVID-19 CT, X-Ray, and Cholesterol Datacited by 10
- 2014Maximum Margin Multiclass Nearest Neighborscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.