Defending Label Inference Attacks in Split Learning under Regression Setting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a privacy-preserving method for implementing Vertical Federated Learning, Split Learning has been extensively researched. However, numerous studies have indicated that the privacy-preserving capability of Split Learning is insufficient. In this paper, we primarily focus on label inference attacks in Split Learning under regression setting, which are mainly implemented through the gradient inversion method. To defend against label inference attacks, we propose Random Label Extension (RLE), where labels are extended to obfuscate the label information contained in the gradients, thereby preventing the attacker from utilizing gradients to train an attack model that can infer the original labels. To further minimize the impact on the original task, we propose Model-based adaptive Label Extension (MLE), where original labels are preserved in the extended labels and dominate the training process. The experimental results show that compared to the basic defense methods, our proposed defense methods can significantly reduce the attack model's performance while preserving the original task's performance.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2023.
Builds on
21 of 30 references.
References · 21
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 391
- 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 113
- 2020Feature Inference Attack on Model Predictions in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 105
- 2020Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split Learningcited by 104
- 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 87
- 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
- 2020NoPeek: Information leakage reduction to share activations in distributed deep learningcited by 66
- 2020Can We Use Split Learning on 1D CNN Models for Privacy Preserving Training?cited by 50
- 2022BlindFL: Vertical Federated Machine Learning without Peeking into Your Datacited by 36
- 2022Compressed-VFL: Communication-Efficient Learning with Vertically Partitioned Datacited by 36
9 more
- 2022Label Leakage and Protection from Forward Embedding in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2022Differential Private Knowledge Transfer for Privacy-Preserving Cross-Domain Recommendationcited by 22
- 2023Reducing Communication for Split Learning by Randomized Top-k Sparsificationcited by 22
- 2022Similarity-based Label Inference Attack against Training and Inference of Split Learningcited by 15
- 2021Communication and Computation Reduction for Split Learning using Asynchronous Trainingcited by 11
- 2022Does Label Differential Privacy Prevent Label Inference Attacks?cited by 10
- 2023Label Inference Attack against Split Learning under Regression Settingcited by 7
- 2021Label Inference Attacks from Log-loss Scorescited by 4
- 2022Protecting Split Learning by Potential Energy Losscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.