Exposing Influence Campaigns in the Age of LLMs: A Behavioral-Based AI Approach to Detecting State-Sponsored Trolls
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The detection of state-sponsored trolls operating in influence campaigns on social media is a critical and unsolved challenge for the research community, which has significant implications beyond the online realm. To address this challenge, we propose a new AI-based solution that identifies troll accounts solely through behavioral cues associated with their sequences of sharing activity, encompassing both their actions and the feedback they receive from others. Our approach does not incorporate any textual content shared and consists of two steps: First, we leverage an LSTM-based classifier to determine whether account sequences belong to a state-sponsored troll or an organic, legitimate user. Second, we employ the classified sequences to calculate a metric named the "Troll Score", quantifying the degree to which an account exhibits troll-like behavior. To assess the effectiveness of our method, we examine its performance in the context of the 2016 Russian interference campaign during the U.S. Presidential election. Our experiments yield compelling results, demonstrating that our approach can identify account sequences with an AUC close to 99% and accurately differentiate between Russian trolls and organic users with an AUC of 91%. Notably, our behavioral-based approach holds a significant advantage in the ever-evolving landscape, where textual and linguistic properties can be easily mimicked by Large Language Models (LLMs): In contrast to existing language-based techniques, it relies on more challenging-to-replicate behavioral cues, ensuring greater resilience in identifying influence campaigns, especially given the potential increase in the usage of LLMs for generating inauthentic content. Finally, we assessed the generalizability of our solution to various entities driving different information operations and found promising results that will guide future research.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.
Builds on
21 of 71 references.
References · 21
- 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
- 2018Deep Neural Networks for Bot Detectioncited by 37
- 2016Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebookcited by 27
- 2019RTbust: Exploiting Temporal Patterns for Botnet Detection on Twittercited by 27
- 2018Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systemscited by 26
- 2020#Election2020: The First Public Twitter Dataset on the 2020 US Presidential Electioncited by 17
- 2021Online misinformation is linked to early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusalcited by 13
- 2018Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA Influence Campaigncited by 11
- 2019Still out there: Modeling and Identifying Russian Troll Accounts on Twittercited by 11
- 2021TROLLMAGNIFIER: Detecting State-Sponsored Troll Accounts on Redditcited by 10
- 2018Who Let The Trolls Out? Towards Understanding State-Sponsored Trollscited by 9
- 2019Red Bots Do It Better: Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Partisan Behaviorcited by 9
9 more
- 2015Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformationcited by 8
- 2022Pathways through Conspiracy: The Evolution of Conspiracy Radicalization through Engagement in Online Conspiracy Discussionscited by 8
- 2022Identifying and Characterizing Behavioral Classes of Radicalization within the QAnon Conspiracy on Twittercited by 7
- 2015Manipulation and abuse on social mediacited by 6
- 2020TrollHunter [Evader]: Automated Detection [Evasion] of Twitter Trolls During the COVID-19 Pandemiccited by 6
- 2022How does Twitter account moderation work? Dynamics of account creation and suspension on Twitter during major geopolitical eventscited by 6
- 2022One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Studycited by 5
- 2019A Graph-Based Machine Learning Approach for Bot Detectioncited by 4
- 2019Analysing user identity via time-sensitive semantic edit distance (t-SED): A case study of Russian trolls on Twittercited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023Leveraging Large Language Models to Detect Influence Campaigns in Social Mediacited by 13
- 2023Contextualizing Internet Memes Across Social Media Platformscited by 5
- 2024IOHunter: Graph Foundation Model to Uncover Online Information Operationscited by 4
- 2025Network-informed Prompt Engineering against Organized Astroturf Campaigns under Extreme Class Imbalancecited by 4
- 2024Coordinated Reply Attacks in Influence Operations: Characterization and Detectioncited by 3
- 2025A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language models and large language modelscited by 3
- 2026Beyond Content: Behavioral Policies Reveal Actors in Information Operationscited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Anomaly Detection of Information Operations Users via Behavioral and Language Patternscited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Anomaly Detection of Information Operations Users via Behavioral and Language Patterns7 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond Content: Behavioral Policies Reveal Actors in Information Operations2 Feb 2026
- 2025Network-informed Prompt Engineering against Organized Astroturf Campaigns under Extreme Class Imbalance21 Jan 2025
- 2025A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language models and large language models9 Jan 2025
- 2024IOHunter: Graph Foundation Model to Uncover Online Information Operations19 Dec 2024
- 2024Coordinated Reply Attacks in Influence Operations: Characterization and Detection25 Oct 2024
- 2023Contextualizing Internet Memes Across Social Media Platforms18 Nov 2023
- 2023Leveraging Large Language Models to Detect Influence Campaigns in Social Media14 Nov 2023