mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reducing Annotation Effort by Identifying and Labeling Contextually Diverse Classes for Semantic Segmentation Under Domain Shift

arXiv 2210.06749 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Active Domain Adaptation (ADA), one uses Active Learning (AL) to select a subset of images from the target domain, which are then annotated and used for supervised domain adaptation (DA). Given the large performance gap between supervised and unsupervised DA techniques, ADA allows for an excellent trade-off between annotation cost and performance. Prior art makes use of measures of uncertainty or disagreement of models to identify `regions' to be annotated by the human oracle. However, these regions frequently comprise of pixels at object boundaries which are hard and tedious to annotate. Hence, even if the fraction of image pixels annotated reduces, the overall annotation time and the resulting cost still remain high. In this work, we propose an ADA strategy, which given a frame, identifies a set of classes that are hardest for the model to predict accurately, thereby recommending semantically meaningful regions to be annotated in a selected frame. We show that these set of `hard' classes are context-dependent and typically vary across frames, and when annotated help the model generalize better. We propose two ADA techniques: the Anchor-based and Augmentation-based approaches to select complementary and diverse regions in the context of the current training set. Our approach achieves 66.6 mIoU on GTA to Cityscapes dataset with an annotation budget of 4.7% in comparison to 64.9 mIoU by MADA using 5% of annotations. Our technique can also be used as a decorator for any existing frame-based AL technique, e.g., we report 1.5% performance improvement for CDAL on Cityscapes using our approach.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

Builds on

35 of 47 references.

References · 35

  1. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  4. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  5. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
  6. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 816
  7. 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
  8. 2016Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networkscited by 609
  9. 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 597
  10. 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
  11. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  12. 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
23 more
  1. 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 333
  2. 2018Taking A Closer Look at Domain Shift: Category-level Adversaries for Semantics Consistent Domain Adaptationcited by 295
  3. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  4. 2021Prototypical Pseudo Label Denoising and Target Structure Learning for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 268
  5. 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
  6. 2020Instance Adaptive Self-Training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 177
  7. 2021Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 168
  8. 2019Category Anchor-Guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 151
  9. 2019Domain Adaptation for Structured Output via Discriminative Patch Representationscited by 150
  10. 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
  11. 2019Constructing Self-motivated Pyramid Curriculums for Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation: A Non-Adversarial Approachcited by 103
  12. 2021Generalize then Adapt: Source-Free Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 81
  13. 2019Active Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 73
  14. 2020Active Domain Adaptation via Clustering Uncertainty-weighted Embeddingscited by 71
  15. 2020Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation Using Weak Labelscited by 56
  16. 2020Source-Relaxed Domain Adaptation for Image Segmentationcited by 52
  17. 2020Alleviating Semantic-level Shift: A Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation Method for Semantic Segmentationcited by 35
  18. 2021Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation based on Dual-level Domain Mixing for Semantic Segmentationcited by 33
  19. 2021LabOR: Labeling Only if Required for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 33
  20. 2020Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Mobile Semantic Segmentation based on Cycle Consistency and Feature Alignmentcited by 29
  21. 2021Multi-Anchor Active Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 29
  22. 2018Semantic-aware Grad-GAN for Virtual-to-Real Urban Scene Adaptioncited by 27
  23. 2021S3VAADA: Submodular Subset Selection for Virtual Adversarial Active Domain Adaptationcited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.