Walk a Mile in Their Shoes: a New Fairness Criterion for Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The old empathetic adage, ``Walk a mile in their shoes,'' asks that one imagine the difficulties others may face. This suggests a new ML counterfactual fairness criterion, based on a textitgroup level: How would members of a nonprotected group fare if their group were subject to conditions in some protected group? Instead of asking what sentence would a particular Caucasian convict receive if he were Black, take that notion to entire groups; e.g. how would the average sentence for all White convicts change if they were Black, but with their same White characteristics, e.g. same number of prior convictions? We frame the problem and study it empirically, for different datasets. Our approach also is a solution to the problem of covariate correlation with sensitive attributes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.
Builds on
14 of 46 references.
References · 14
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
- 2018iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 64
- 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
- 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
- 2013Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknifecited by 43
- 2020A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptationcited by 20
- 2019On the Legal Compatibility of Fairness Definitionscited by 19
- 2022The Fairness of Credit Scoring Modelscited by 15
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.