mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Explicit Credit Assignment for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Polarization Policy Gradient

arXiv 2210.05367 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cooperative multi-agent policy gradient (MAPG) algorithms have recently attracted wide attention and are regarded as a general scheme for the multi-agent system. Credit assignment plays an important role in MAPG and can induce cooperation among multiple agents. However, most MAPG algorithms cannot achieve good credit assignment because of the game-theoretic pathology known as textitcentralized-decentralized mismatch. To address this issue, this paper presents a novel method, textitunderlineMulti-underlineAgent underlinePolarization underlinePolicy underlineGradient (MAPPG). MAPPG takes a simple but efficient polarization function to transform the optimal consistency of joint and individual actions into easily realized constraints, thus enabling efficient credit assignment in MAPG. Theoretically, we prove that individual policies of MAPPG can converge to the global optimum. Empirically, we evaluate MAPPG on the well-known matrix game and differential game, and verify that MAPPG can converge to the global optimum for both discrete and continuous action spaces. We also evaluate MAPPG on a set of StarCraft II micromanagement tasks and demonstrate that MAPPG outperforms the state-of-the-art MAPG algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2022.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  5. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  6. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  7. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  8. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  9. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  10. 2020FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradientscited by 178
  11. 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  12. 2017Deep Decentralized Multi-task Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observabilitycited by 143
7 more
  1. 2020Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy Gradientscited by 97
  2. 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 71
  3. 2020Value-Decomposition Multi-Agent Actor-Criticscited by 47
  4. 2018Multiagent Soft Q-Learningcited by 26
  5. 2020Polarized-VAE: Proximity Based Disentangled Representation Learning for Text Generationcited by 7
  6. 2021Instance-Aware Predictive Navigation in Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 5
  7. 2021Deep reinforcement learning of event-triggered communication and control for multi-agent cooperative transportcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.