mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-supervised debiasing using low rank regularization

arXiv 2210.05248 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spurious correlations can cause strong biases in deep neural networks, impairing generalization ability. While most existing debiasing methods require full supervision on either spurious attributes or target labels, training a debiased model from a limited amount of both annotations is still an open question. To address this issue, we investigate an interesting phenomenon using the spectral analysis of latent representations: spuriously correlated attributes make neural networks inductively biased towards encoding lower effective rank representations. We also show that a rank regularization can amplify this bias in a way that encourages highly correlated features. Leveraging these findings, we propose a self-supervised debiasing framework potentially compatible with unlabeled samples. Specifically, we first pretrain a biased encoder in a self-supervised manner with the rank regularization, serving as a semantic bottleneck to enforce the encoder to learn the spuriously correlated attributes. This biased encoder is then used to discover and upweight bias-conflicting samples in a downstream task, serving as a boosting to effectively debias the main model. Remarkably, the proposed debiasing framework significantly improves the generalization performance of self-supervised learning baselines and, in some cases, even outperforms state-of-the-art supervised debiasing approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

Builds on

58 of 76 references.

References · 58

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  7. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  9. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  10. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  11. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  12. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
38 more
  1. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  2. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  3. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,114
  4. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  5. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 972
  6. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  7. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  8. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  9. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
  10. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  11. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  12. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
  13. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 398
  14. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  15. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  16. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
  17. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
  18. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  19. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  20. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  21. 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 221
  22. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  23. 2020Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 179
  24. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
  25. 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 172
  26. 2021The Low-Rank Simplicity Bias in Deep Networkscited by 154
  27. 2020Understanding the Failure Modes of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 146
  28. 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 130
  29. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  30. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
  31. 2019Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Outcited by 123
  32. 2021Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpacecited by 122
  33. 2020Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Normscited by 119
  34. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  35. 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
  36. 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
  37. 2021Can Subnetwork Structure be the Key to Out-of-Distribution Generalization?cited by 75
  38. 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

8 papers.