Mutual Theory of Mind for Human-AI Communication
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
New developments are enabling AI systems to perceive, recognize, and respond with social cues based on inferences made from humans' explicit or implicit behavioral and verbal cues. These AI systems, equipped with an equivalent of human's Theory of Mind (ToM) capability, are currently serving as matchmakers on dating platforms, assisting student learning as teaching assistants, and enhancing productivity as work partners. They mark a new era in human-AI interaction (HAI) that diverges from traditional human-computer interaction (HCI), where computers are commonly seen as tools instead of social actors. Designing and understanding the human perceptions and experiences in this emerging HAI era becomes an urgent and critical issue for AI systems to fulfill human needs and mitigate risks across social contexts. In this paper, we posit the Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) framework, inspired by our capability of ToM in human-human communications, to guide this new generation of HAI research by highlighting the iterative and mutual shaping nature of human-AI communication. We discuss the motivation of the MToM framework and its three key components that iteratively shape the human-AI communication in three stages. We then describe two empirical studies inspired by the MToM framework to demonstrate the power of MToM in guiding the design and understanding of human-AI communication. Finally, we discuss future research opportunities in human-AI interaction through the lens of MToM.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2022.
Builds on
7 of 62 references.
References · 7
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
- 2020Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approachcited by 90
- 2019What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agentscited by 42
- 2021Perfection Not Required? Human-AI Partnerships in Code Translationcited by 42
- 2019Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learningcited by 37
- 2015What do they know about me? Contents and Concerns of Online Behavioral Profilescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Modelscited by 31
- 2024Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmapcited by 30
- 2024Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Taskcited by 17
- 2025Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspectivecited by 14
- 2025Toward Metaphor-Fluid Conversation Design for Voice User Interfacescited by 5
- 2025Scopes of Alignmentcited by 3
- 2026Knowledge Affordances for Hybrid Human-AI Information Seekingcited by 2
- 2025Towards Conversational Development Environments: Using Theory-of-Mind and Multi-Agent Architectures for Requirements Refinementcited by 1
- 2025Conversational Alignment with Artificial Intelligence in Contextcited by 1
- 2026Visual and Cognitive Demands of a Large Language Model-Powered In-vehicle Conversational Agentcited by 1
- 2026Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitionerscited by 1
- 2025When Researchers Say Mental Model/Theory of Mind of AI, What Are They Really Talking About?cited by 0
- 2026Towards Cognitive Process-Aware Proactive Writing Support31 Aug 2026
- 2026Knowledge Affordances for Hybrid Human-AI Information Seeking30 Apr 2026
- 2026Mixed-Initiative Context: Structuring and Managing Context for Human-AI Collaboration8 Apr 2026
- 2026Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitioners11 Feb 2026
- 2026Visual and Cognitive Demands of a Large Language Model-Powered In-vehicle Conversational Agent21 Jan 2026
- 2025What Do You Mean? Exploring How Humans and AI Interact with Symbols and Meanings in Their Interactions6 Oct 2025
- 2025When Researchers Say Mental Model/Theory of Mind of AI, What Are They Really Talking About?3 Oct 2025
- 2025Conversational Alignment with Artificial Intelligence in Context28 May 2025
- 2025Towards Conversational Development Environments: Using Theory-of-Mind and Multi-Agent Architectures for Requirements Refinement27 May 2025
- 2025Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspective15 Apr 2025
- 2025Toward Metaphor-Fluid Conversation Design for Voice User Interfaces17 Feb 2025
- 2025Scopes of Alignment15 Jan 2025
3 more
- 2024Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Models27 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap8 Oct 2024
- 2024Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task13 Sep 2024
- 2025Scopes of Alignmentcited by 3
- 2025Scopes of Alignment15 Jan 2025
- 2024Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Modelscited by 31
- 2024Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmapcited by 30
- 2025Toward Metaphor-Fluid Conversation Design for Voice User Interfacescited by 5
- 2026Knowledge Affordances for Hybrid Human-AI Information Seekingcited by 2
- 2025Conversational Alignment with Artificial Intelligence in Contextcited by 1
- 2026Visual and Cognitive Demands of a Large Language Model-Powered In-vehicle Conversational Agentcited by 1
- 2026Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitionerscited by 1
- 2025When Researchers Say Mental Model/Theory of Mind of AI, What Are They Really Talking About?cited by 0
- 2025What Do You Mean? Exploring How Humans and AI Interact with Symbols and Meanings in Their Interactionscited by 0
- 2026Mixed-Initiative Context: Structuring and Managing Context for Human-AI Collaborationcited by 0
- 2026Towards Cognitive Process-Aware Proactive Writing Supportcited by 0
- 2026Towards Cognitive Process-Aware Proactive Writing Support31 Aug 2026
- 2026Knowledge Affordances for Hybrid Human-AI Information Seeking30 Apr 2026
- 2026Mixed-Initiative Context: Structuring and Managing Context for Human-AI Collaboration8 Apr 2026
- 2026Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitioners11 Feb 2026
- 2026Visual and Cognitive Demands of a Large Language Model-Powered In-vehicle Conversational Agent21 Jan 2026
- 2025What Do You Mean? Exploring How Humans and AI Interact with Symbols and Meanings in Their Interactions6 Oct 2025
- 2025When Researchers Say Mental Model/Theory of Mind of AI, What Are They Really Talking About?3 Oct 2025
- 2025Conversational Alignment with Artificial Intelligence in Context28 May 2025
- 2025Toward Metaphor-Fluid Conversation Design for Voice User Interfaces17 Feb 2025
- 2024Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Models27 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap8 Oct 2024