Non-Convergence and Limit Cycles in the Adam optimizer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the most popular training algorithms for deep neural networks is the Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam) introduced by Kingma and Ba. Despite its success in many applications there is no satisfactory convergence analysis: only local convergence can be shown for batch mode under some restrictions on the hyperparameters, counterexamples exist for incremental mode. Recent results show that for simple quadratic objective functions limit cycles of period 2 exist in batch mode, but only for atypical hyperparameters, and only for the algorithm without bias correction. %More general there are several more adaptive gradient methods which try to estimate a fitting learning rate and / or search direction from the training data to improve the learning process compared to pure gradient descent with fixed learningrate. We extend the convergence analysis for Adam in the batch mode with bias correction and show that even for quadratic objective functions as the simplest case of convex functions 2-limit-cycles exist, for all choices of the hyperparameters. We analyze the stability of these limit cycles and relate our analysis to other results where approximate convergence was shown, but under the additional assumption of bounded gradients which does not apply to quadratic functions. The investigation heavily relies on the use of computer algebra due to the complexity of the equations.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2022.
Builds on
8 of 13 references.
References · 8
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2018Universality of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
- 2018On the Convergence of A Class of Adam-Type Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 173
- 2018A Sufficient Condition for Convergences of Adam and RMSPropcited by 124
- 2016Stochastic Heavy Ballcited by 40
- 2018Convergence guarantees for RMSProp and ADAM in non-convex optimization and an empirical comparison to Nesterov accelerationcited by 39
- 2018A general system of differential equations to model first order adaptive algorithmscited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
9 papers.
- 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspectivecited by 123
- 2026The Implicit Bias of Adam and Muon on Smooth Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2026Towards Understanding Adam Convergence on Highly Degenerate Polynomialscited by 3
- 2026Uniform a priori bounds and error analysis for the Adam stochastic gradient descent optimization methodcited by 2
- 2024Towards Communication-efficient Federated Learning via Sparse and Aligned Adaptive Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Gradient Descent with Provably Tuned Learning-rate Schedulescited by 1
- 2026Deterministic Adam-Inspired Methods with Accelerated Convergence Ratecited by 1
- 2026On the Convergence of Adam, Revisitedcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Quadratic Loss: The Stability Phase Diagram of Adamcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Quadratic Loss: The Stability Phase Diagram of Adam16 Sep 2026
- 2026On the Convergence of Adam, Revisited3 Jul 2026
- 2026Deterministic Adam-Inspired Methods with Accelerated Convergence Rate9 Apr 2026
- 2026Uniform a priori bounds and error analysis for the Adam stochastic gradient descent optimization method19 Mar 2026
- 2026Towards Understanding Adam Convergence on Highly Degenerate Polynomials10 Mar 2026
- 2026The Implicit Bias of Adam and Muon on Smooth Homogeneous Neural Networks18 Feb 2026
- 2025Gradient Descent with Provably Tuned Learning-rate Schedules4 Dec 2025
- 2024Towards Communication-efficient Federated Learning via Sparse and Aligned Adaptive Optimization28 May 2024
- 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspective26 Feb 2024