Gradient Descent with Provably Tuned Learning-rate Schedules
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient-based iterative optimization methods are the workhorse of modern machine learning. They crucially rely on careful tuning of parameters like learning rate and momentum. However, one typically sets them using heuristic approaches without formal near-optimality guarantees. Recent work by Gupta and Roughgarden studies how to learn a good step-size in gradient descent. However, like most of the literature with theoretical guarantees for gradient-based optimization, their results rely on strong assumptions on the function class including convexity and smoothness which do not hold in typical applications. In this work, we develop novel analytical tools for provably tuning hyperparameters in gradient-based algorithms that apply to non-convex and non-smooth functions. We obtain matching sample complexity bounds for learning the step-size in gradient descent shown for smooth, convex functions in prior work (up to logarithmic factors) but for a much broader class of functions. Our analysis applies to gradient descent on neural networks with commonly used activation functions (including ReLU, sigmoid and tanh). We extend our framework to tuning multiple hyperparameters, including tuning the learning rate schedule, simultaneously tuning momentum and step-size, and pre-training the initialization vector. Our approach can be used to bound the sample complexity for minimizing both the validation loss as well as the number of gradient descent iterations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.
Builds on
63 of 90 references.
References · 63
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
38 more
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 357
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2019Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step backcited by 333
- 2019Optimizing Millions of Hyperparameters by Implicit Differentiationcited by 303
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 282
- 2016Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaoscited by 260
- 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
- 2016Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradientcited by 231
- 2016Learning to Optimizecited by 195
- 2019Fixup Initialization: Residual Learning Without Normalizationcited by 194
- 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
- 2019Adaptive Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Methodscited by 183
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 169
- 2017Resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry: theory and practicecited by 132
- 2017No Spurious Local Minima in Nonconvex Low Rank Problems: A Unified Geometric Analysiscited by 127
- 2017Online Learning Rate Adaptation with Hypergradient Descentcited by 117
- 2018On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 91
- 2015A PAC Approach to Application-Specific Algorithm Selectioncited by 57
- 2019Learning-to-Learn Stochastic Gradient Descent with Biased Regularizationcited by 49
- 2024Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvementscited by 45
- 2017Dispersion for Data-Driven Algorithm Design, Online Learning, and Private Optimizationcited by 37
- 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiencycited by 34
- 2016Learning-Theoretic Foundations of Algorithm Configuration for Combinatorial Partitioning Problemscited by 30
- 2022The Power and Limitation of Pretraining-Finetuning for Linear Regression under Covariate Shiftcited by 25
- 2022Generalization Bounds for Data-Driven Numerical Linear Algebracited by 24
- 2021KAISA: An Adaptive Second-Order Optimizer Framework for Deep Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2018An improvement of the convergence proof of the ADAM-Optimizercited by 19
- 2021Learning-to-learn non-convex piecewise-Lipschitz functionscited by 15
- 2022Provably tuning the ElasticNet across instancescited by 14
- 2020Learning Complexity of Simulated Annealingcited by 12
- 2021Provable Super-Convergence with a Large Cyclical Learning Ratecited by 10
- 2023Generalization Bound and Learning Methods for Data-Driven Projections in Linear Programmingcited by 10
- 2024Sample Complexity of Posted Pricing for a Single Itemcited by 10
- 2024Algorithm Configuration for Structured Pfaffian Settingscited by 10
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.