Recycling Scraps: Improving Private Learning by Leveraging Intermediate Checkpoints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we focus on improving the accuracy-variance trade-off for state-of-the-art differentially private machine learning (DP ML) methods. First, we design a general framework that uses aggregates of intermediate checkpoints during training to increase the accuracy of DP ML techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate that training over aggregates can provide significant gains in prediction accuracy over the existing state-of-the-art for StackOverflow, CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets. For instance, we improve the state-of-the-art DP StackOverflow accuracies to 22.74% (+2.06% relative) for ε=8.2, and 23.90% (+2.09%) for ε=18.9. Furthermore, these gains magnify in settings with periodically varying training data distributions. We also demonstrate that our methods achieve relative improvements of 0.54% and 62.6% in terms of utility and variance, on a proprietary, production-grade pCVR task. Lastly, we initiate an exploration into estimating the uncertainty (variance) that DP noise adds in the predictions of DP ML models. We prove that, under standard assumptions on the loss function, the sample variance from last few checkpoints provides a good approximation of the variance of the final model of a DP run. Empirically, we show that the last few checkpoints can provide a reasonable lower bound for the variance of a converged DP model. Crucially, all the methods proposed in this paper operate on a single training run of the DP ML technique, thus incurring no additional privacy cost.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2022.
Builds on
55 of 94 references.
References · 55
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
38 more
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
- 2017Deep & Cross Network for Ad Click Predictionscited by 392
- 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 359
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 278
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
- 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
- 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 152
- 2018Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentationcited by 146
- 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
- 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 121
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
- 2017Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervalscited by 103
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
- 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
- 2018Tight Analyses for Non-Smooth Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 94
- 2018A General Approach to Adding Differential Privacy to Iterative Training Procedurescited by 84
- 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 74
- 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 71
- 2017A Hitting Time Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 70
- 2020Training Production Language Models without Memorizing User Datacited by 68
- 2021Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecturecited by 63
- 2022Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streamscited by 59
- 2021Property Inference From Poisoningcited by 56
- 2021Public Data-Assisted Mirror Descent for Private Model Trainingcited by 49
- 2020Convergence of Langevin Monte Carlo in Chi-Squared and Renyi Divergencecited by 42
- 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
- 2020Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Inscited by 39
- 2020Faster Differentially Private Samplers via R'enyi Divergence Analysis of Discretized Langevin MCMCcited by 27
- 2017Checkpoint Ensembles: Ensemble Methods from a Single Training Processcited by 24
- 2018Inherent Brain Segmentation Quality Control from Fully ConvNet Monte Carlo Samplingcited by 20
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Learning from straggler clients in federated learningcited by 1
- 2024Learning from straggler clients in federated learning14 Mar 2024