mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unveiling the Black Box of PLMs with Semantic Anchors: Towards Interpretable Neural Semantic Parsing

arXiv 2210.01425 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent prevalence of pretrained language models (PLMs) has dramatically shifted the paradigm of semantic parsing, where the mapping from natural language utterances to structured logical forms is now formulated as a Seq2Seq task. Despite the promising performance, previous PLM-based approaches often suffer from hallucination problems due to their negligence of the structural information contained in the sentence, which essentially constitutes the key semantics of the logical forms. Furthermore, most works treat PLM as a black box in which the generation process of the target logical form is hidden beneath the decoder modules, which greatly hinders the model's intrinsic interpretability. To address these two issues, we propose to incorporate the current PLMs with a hierarchical decoder network. By taking the first-principle structures as the semantic anchors, we propose two novel intermediate supervision tasks, namely Semantic Anchor Extraction and Semantic Anchor Alignment, for training the hierarchical decoders and probing the model intermediate representations in a self-adaptive manner alongside the fine-tuning process. We conduct intensive experiments on several semantic parsing benchmarks and demonstrate that our approach can consistently outperform the baselines. More importantly, by analyzing the intermediate representations of the hierarchical decoders, our approach also makes a huge step toward the intrinsic interpretability of PLMs in the domain of semantic parsing.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2022.

Builds on

46 of 63 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  8. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  9. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  10. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  11. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  12. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 402
34 more
  1. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  2. 2022UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Modelscited by 231
  3. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  4. 2018Fast Lexically Constrained Decoding with Dynamic Beam Allocation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 181
  5. 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
  6. 2021Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parserscited by 162
  7. 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
  8. 2018Coarse-to-Fine Decoding for Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 110
  9. 2019A Comprehensive Exploration on WikiSQL with Table-Aware Word Contextualizationcited by 88
  10. 2020KQA Pro: A Dataset with Explicit Compositional Programs for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Basecited by 76
  11. 2020Learning Contextual Representations for Semantic Parsing with Generation-Augmented Pre-Trainingcited by 65
  12. 2018A Survey on Semantic Parsingcited by 62
  13. 2020On the Potential of Lexico-logical Alignments for Semantic Parsing to SQL Queriescited by 59
  14. 2018Robust Text-to-SQL Generation with Execution-Guided Decodingcited by 51
  15. 2021Few-Shot Semantic Parsing with Language Models Trained On Codecited by 50
  16. 2020SPARQA: Skeleton-based Semantic Parsing for Complex Questions over Knowledge Basescited by 47
  17. 2019Semantic Parsing with Dual Learningcited by 28
  18. 2021Awakening Latent Grounding from Pretrained Language Models for Semantic Parsingcited by 28
  19. 2021SeaD: End-to-end Text-to-SQL Generation with Schema-aware Denoisingcited by 27
  20. 2021Improving Text-to-SQL with Schema Dependency Learningcited by 25
  21. 2019Core Semantic First: A Top-down Approach for AMR Parsingcited by 24
  22. 2016Foundations of Modern Query Languages for Graph Databasescited by 22
  23. 2018Sequence-to-Action: End-to-End Semantic Graph Generation for Semantic Parsingcited by 21
  24. 2020Unsupervised Dual Paraphrasing for Two-stage Semantic Parsingcited by 20
  25. 2017Cross-domain Semantic Parsing via Paraphrasingcited by 19
  26. 2021Translate & Fill: Improving Zero-Shot Multilingual Semantic Parsing with Synthetic Datacited by 17
  27. 2021RETRONLU: Retrieval Augmented Task-Oriented Semantic Parsingcited by 15
  28. 2021Decoupled Dialogue Modeling and Semantic Parsing for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQLcited by 13
  29. 2021On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic Parsercited by 13
  30. 2020On the Sub-Layer Functionalities of Transformer Decodercited by 12
  31. 2019Zero-shot Text-to-SQL Learning with Auxiliary Taskcited by 10
  32. 2021A Unified Transferable Model for ML-Enhanced DBMScited by 10
  33. 2021Learning from Executions for Semantic Parsingcited by 7
  34. 2020An Investigation of Language Model Interpretability via Sentence Editingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

5 papers.