An Efficient Algorithm for Fair Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandit with Low Regret
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently a multi-agent variant of the classical multi-armed bandit was proposed to tackle fairness issues in online learning. Inspired by a long line of work in social choice and economics, the goal is to optimize the Nash social welfare instead of the total utility. Unfortunately previous algorithms either are not efficient or achieve sub-optimal regret in terms of the number of rounds T. We propose a new efficient algorithm with lower regret than even previous inefficient ones. For N agents, K arms, and T rounds, our approach has a regret bound of tildeO(√NKT + NK). This is an improvement to the previous approach, which has regret bound of tildeO( min(NK, √N K3/2)√T). We also complement our efficient algorithm with an inefficient approach with tildeO(√KT + N2K) regret. The experimental findings confirm the effectiveness of our efficient algorithm compared to the previous approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2022.
Builds on
11 of 35 references.
References · 11
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 77
- 2013Bandits and Experts in Metric Spacescited by 63
- 2016Kernel-based methods for bandit convex optimizationcited by 63
- 2018Online Learning with an Unknown Fairness Metriccited by 61
- 2016Distributed Cooperative Decision-Making in Multiarmed Bandits: Frequentist and Bayesian Algorithmscited by 48
- 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 42
- 2020Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 41
- 2015Multi-scale exploration of convex functions and bandit convex optimizationcited by 20
- 2018Projection-Free Bandit Convex Optimizationcited by 17
- 2016Fair Algorithms for Infinite and Contextual Banditscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2025Incentivizing Truthful Language Models via Peer Elicitation Gamescited by 8
- 2024No-Regret Learning for Fair Multi-Agent Social Welfare Optimizationcited by 7
- 2025Revisiting Social Welfare in Bandits: UCB is (Nearly) All You Needcited by 3
- 2025Fairness Aware Reinforcement Learning via Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Bandit Max-Min Fair Allocationcited by 1
- 2025Fair Algorithms with Probing for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 1
- 2026Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Bandits: From Learning Efficiency to Fairness Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandits with Minimum Reward Guarantee Fairnesscited by 0
- 2026Procedural Fairness in Multi-Agent Banditscited by 0
- 2026Multi-User Dueling Bandits: A Fair Approach using Nash Social Welfarecited by 0
- 2026Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Bandits: From Learning Efficiency to Fairness Optimization7 May 2026
- 2026Multi-User Dueling Bandits: A Fair Approach using Nash Social Welfare3 May 2026
- 2026Procedural Fairness in Multi-Agent Bandits15 Jan 2026
- 2025Revisiting Social Welfare in Bandits: UCB is (Nearly) All You Need24 Oct 2025
- 2025Fair Algorithms with Probing for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits17 Jun 2025
- 2025Incentivizing Truthful Language Models via Peer Elicitation Games19 May 2025
- 2025Bandit Max-Min Fair Allocation8 May 2025
- 2025Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandits with Minimum Reward Guarantee Fairness21 Feb 2025
- 2025Fairness Aware Reinforcement Learning via Proximal Policy Optimization6 Feb 2025
- 2024No-Regret Learning for Fair Multi-Agent Social Welfare Optimization31 May 2024