Exploring Optimal Granularity for Extractive Summarization of Unstructured Health Records: Analysis of the Largest Multi-Institutional Archive of Health Records in Japan
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated summarization of clinical texts can reduce the burden of medical professionals. "Discharge summaries" are one promising application of the summarization, because they can be generated from daily inpatient records. Our preliminary experiment suggests that 20-31% of the descriptions in discharge summaries overlap with the content of the inpatient records. However, it remains unclear how the summaries should be generated from the unstructured source. To decompose the physician's summarization process, this study aimed to identify the optimal granularity in summarization. We first defined three types of summarization units with different granularities to compare the performance of the discharge summary generation: whole sentences, clinical segments, and clauses. We defined clinical segments in this study, aiming to express the smallest medically meaningful concepts. To obtain the clinical segments, it was necessary to automatically split the texts in the first stage of the pipeline. Accordingly, we compared rule-based methods and a machine learning method, and the latter outperformed the formers with an F1 score of 0.846 in the splitting task. Next, we experimentally measured the accuracy of extractive summarization using the three types of units, based on the ROUGE-1 metric, on a multi-institutional national archive of health records in Japan. The measured accuracies of extractive summarization using whole sentences, clinical segments, and clauses were 31.91, 36.15, and 25.18, respectively. We found that the clinical segments yielded higher accuracy than sentences and clauses. This result indicates that summarization of inpatient records demands finer granularity than sentence-oriented processing. Although we used only Japanese health records, it can be interpreted as follows: physicians extract "concepts of medical significance" from patient records and recombine them ...
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.
Builds on
18 of 76 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
- 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 279
- 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
- 2020Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 66
- 2021What's in a Summary? Laying the Groundwork for Advances in Hospital-Course Summarizationcited by 35
- 2019Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarizationcited by 33
- 2018Natural Language Generation for Electronic Health Recordscited by 27
- 2021Towards Clinical Encounter Summarization: Learning to Compose Discharge Summaries from Prior Notescited by 18
6 more
- 2018Extractive Summarization of EHR Discharge Notescited by 12
- 2020Better Highlighting: Creating Sub-Sentence Summary Highlightscited by 11
- 2018Unsupervised Pseudo-Labeling for Extractive Summarization on Electronic Health Recordscited by 6
- 2021Predicting Patient Readmission Risk from Medical Text via Knowledge Graph Enhanced Multiview Graph Convolutioncited by 5
- 2021Leveraging Deep Representations of Radiology Reports in Survival Analysis for Predicting Heart Failure Patient Mortalitycited by 3
- 2020At Which Level Should We Extract? An Empirical Analysis on Extractive Document Summarizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.