At Which Level Should We Extract? An Empirical Analysis on Extractive Document Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extractive methods have been proven effective in automatic document summarization. Previous works perform this task by identifying informative contents at sentence level. However, it is unclear whether performing extraction at sentence level is the best solution. In this work, we show that unnecessity and redundancy issues exist when extracting full sentences, and extracting sub-sentential units is a promising alternative. Specifically, we propose extracting sub-sentential units based on the constituency parsing tree. A neural extractive model which leverages the sub-sentential information and extracts them is presented. Extensive experiments and analyses show that extracting sub-sentential units performs competitively comparing to full sentence extraction under the evaluation of both automatic and human evaluations. Hopefully, our work could provide some inspiration of the basic extraction units in extractive summarization for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Exploring Optimal Granularity for Extractive Summarization of Unstructured Health Records: Analysis of the Largest Multi-Institutional Archive of Health Records in Japancited by 3
- 2022Generating Tips from Song Reviews: A New Dataset and Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026The Sum of All Summaries: PROPALIGN for Graded Proposition Salience Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026The Sum of All Summaries: PROPALIGN for Graded Proposition Salience Evaluation14 Oct 2026
- 2022Exploring Optimal Granularity for Extractive Summarization of Unstructured Health Records: Analysis of the Largest Multi-Institutional Archive of Health Records in Japan20 Sep 2022
- 2022Generating Tips from Song Reviews: A New Dataset and Framework14 May 2022