mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Power of Explanations: Towards automatic debiasing in hate speech detection

arXiv 2209.09975 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hate speech detection is a common downstream application of natural language processing (NLP) in the real world. In spite of the increasing accuracy, current data-driven approaches could easily learn biases from the imbalanced data distributions originating from humans. The deployment of biased models could further enhance the existing social biases. But unlike handling tabular data, defining and mitigating biases in text classifiers, which deal with unstructured data, are more challenging. A popular solution for improving machine learning fairness in NLP is to conduct the debiasing process with a list of potentially discriminated words given by human annotators. In addition to suffering from the risks of overlooking the biased terms, exhaustively identifying bias with human annotators are unsustainable since discrimination is variable among different datasets and may evolve over time. To this end, we propose an automatic misuse detector (MiD) relying on an explanation method for detecting potential bias. And built upon that, an end-to-end debiasing framework with the proposed staged correction is designed for text classifiers without any external resources required.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2022.

Builds on

29 of 38 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  7. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  8. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  9. 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
  10. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
  11. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
  12. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
17 more
  1. 2021Mitigating Language-Dependent Ethnic Bias in BERTcited by 87
  2. 2017Semi-supervised sequence tagging with bidirectional language modelscited by 86
  3. 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
  4. 2020A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learningcited by 80
  5. 2019AllenNLP Interpret: A Framework for Explaining Predictions of NLP Modelscited by 74
  6. 2018Beyond Word Importance: Contextual Decomposition to Extract Interactions from LSTMscited by 67
  7. 2020Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification via Feature Interaction Detectioncited by 57
  8. 2021Randomness In Neural Network Training: Characterizing The Impact of Toolingcited by 57
  9. 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
  10. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
  11. 2020Investigating Gender Bias in BERTcited by 40
  12. 2020FAE: A Fairness-Aware Ensemble Frameworkcited by 34
  13. 2021Explain and Predict, and then Predict Againcited by 29
  14. 2021Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanationscited by 27
  15. 2021Consequence-aware Sequential Counterfactual Generationcited by 17
  16. 2019How Large a Vocabulary Does Text Classification Need? A Variational Approach to Vocabulary Selectioncited by 11
  17. 2021XPROAX-Local explanations for text classification with progressive neighborhood approximationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.