mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Deep Clustering of Human Activities and How to Improve Evaluation

arXiv 2209.08335 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There has been much recent research on human activity re-cog-ni-tion (HAR), due to the proliferation of wearable sensors in watches and phones, and the advances of deep learning methods, which avoid the need to manually extract features from raw sensor signals. A significant disadvantage of deep learning applied to HAR is the need for manually labelled training data, which is especially difficult to obtain for HAR datasets. Progress is starting to be made in the unsupervised setting, in the form of deep HAR clustering models, which can assign labels to data without having been given any labels to train on, but there are problems with evaluating deep HAR clustering models, which makes assessing the field and devising new methods difficult. In this paper, we highlight several distinct problems with how deep HAR clustering models are evaluated, describing these problems in detail and conducting careful experiments to explicate the effect that they can have on results. We then discuss solutions to these problems, and suggest standard evaluation settings for future deep HAR clustering models. Additionally, we present a new deep clustering model for HAR. When tested under our proposed settings, our model performs better than (or on par with) existing models, while also being more efficient and better able to scale to more complex datasets by avoiding the need for an autoencoder.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2022.

Builds on

14 of 47 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  3. 2017Deep Learning for Sensor-based Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 133
  4. 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 125
  5. 2016Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 93
  6. 2018Protecting Sensory Data against Sensitive Inferencescited by 45
  7. 2019N2D: (Not Too) Deep Clustering via Clustering the Local Manifold of an Autoencoded Embeddingcited by 30
  8. 2015Deep Activity Recognition Models with Triaxial Accelerometerscited by 13
  9. 2019Deep Clustering with a Dynamic Autoencoder: From Reconstruction towards Centroids Constructioncited by 13
  10. 2016Deep Recurrent Neural Network for Mobile Human Activity Recognition with High Throughputcited by 10
  11. 2018Human Activity Recognition using Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 10
  12. 2021Adversarial Deep Feature Extraction Network for User Independent Human Activity Recognitioncited by 10
2 more
  1. 2021Selective Pseudo-label Clusteringcited by 8
  2. 2013An Unsupervised Approach for Automatic Activity Recognition based on Hidden Markov Model Regressioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

5 papers.