mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Distinct and Representative Styles for Image Captioning

arXiv 2209.08231 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2022cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the years, state-of-the-art (SoTA) image captioning methods have achieved promising results on some evaluation metrics (e.g., CIDEr). However, recent findings show that the captions generated by these methods tend to be biased toward the "average" caption that only captures the most general mode (a.k.a, language pattern) in the training corpus, i.e., the so-called mode collapse problem. Affected by it, the generated captions are limited in diversity and usually less informative than natural image descriptions made by humans. In this paper, we seek to avoid this problem by proposing a Discrete Mode Learning (DML) paradigm for image captioning. Our innovative idea is to explore the rich modes in the training caption corpus to learn a set of "mode embeddings", and further use them to control the mode of the generated captions for existing image captioning models. Specifically, the proposed DML optimizes a dual architecture that consists of an image-conditioned discrete variational autoencoder (CdVAE) branch and a mode-conditioned image captioning (MIC) branch. The CdVAE branch maps each image caption to one of the mode embeddings stored in a learned codebook, and is trained with a pure non-autoregressive generation objective to make the modes distinct and representative. The MIC branch can be simply modified from an existing image captioning model, where the mode embedding is added to the original word embeddings as the control signal. In the experiments, we apply the proposed DML to two widely used image captioning models, Transformer and AoANet. The results show that the learned mode embedding successfully facilitates these models to generate high-quality image captions with different modes, further leading to better performance for both diversity and quality on the MSCOCO dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2022.

Builds on

47 of 65 references.

References · 47

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  7. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  8. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  9. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  10. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  11. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  12. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
35 more
  1. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  2. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  3. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  4. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  5. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
  6. 2019Unified Vision-Language Pre-Training for Image Captioning and VQAcited by 494
  7. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
  8. 2019Meshed-Memory Transformer for Image Captioningcited by 343
  9. 2019Attention on Attention for Image Captioningcited by 289
  10. 2018Auto-Encoding Scene Graphs for Image Captioningcited by 254
  11. 2018Exploring Visual Relationship for Image Captioningcited by 215
  12. 2020X-Linear Attention Networks for Image Captioningcited by 198
  13. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
  14. 2019Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 121
  15. 2017Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Imagescited by 101
  16. 2014Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)cited by 94
  17. 2020Say As You Wish: Fine-grained Control of Image Caption Generation with Abstract Scene Graphscited by 87
  18. 2018Show, Control and Tell: A Framework for Generating Controllable and Grounded Captionscited by 65
  19. 2017Towards Diverse and Natural Image Descriptions via a Conditional GANcited by 59
  20. 2018Fast, Diverse and Accurate Image Captioning Guided By Part-of-Speechcited by 55
  21. 2018Engaging Image Captioning Via Personalitycited by 51
  22. 2015SentiCap: Generating Image Descriptions with Sentimentscited by 48
  23. 2019Describing like humans: on diversity in image captioningcited by 46
  24. 2019Factor Graph Attentioncited by 41
  25. 2021Human-like Controllable Image Captioning with Verb-specific Semantic Rolescited by 41
  26. 2020Length-Controllable Image Captioningcited by 36
  27. 2017Diverse and Accurate Image Description Using a Variational Auto-Encoder with an Additive Gaussian Encoding Spacecited by 33
  28. 2020Non-Autoregressive Image Captioning with Counterfactuals-Critical Multi-Agent Learningcited by 28
  29. 2018SemStyle: Learning to Generate Stylised Image Captions using Unaligned Textcited by 27
  30. 2018"Factual" or "Emotional": Stylized Image Captioning with Adaptive Learning and Attentioncited by 26
  31. 2020Diverse Image Captioning with Context-Object Split Latent Spacescited by 22
  32. 2019Sequential Latent Spaces for Modeling the Intention During Diverse Image Captioningcited by 21
  33. 2020Latent Normalizing Flows for Many-to-Many Cross-Domain Mappingscited by 16
  34. 2018Generating Diverse and Accurate Visual Captions by Comparative Adversarial Learningcited by 7
  35. 2020Analysis of diversity-accuracy tradeoff in image captioningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 8; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

12 papers.