mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EZNAS: Evolving Zero Cost Proxies For Neural Architecture Scoring

arXiv 2209.07413 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CV cs.NEcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has significantly improved productivity in the design and deployment of neural networks (NN). As NAS typically evaluates multiple models by training them partially or completely, the improved productivity comes at the cost of significant carbon footprint. To alleviate this expensive training routine, zero-shot/cost proxies analyze an NN at initialization to generate a score, which correlates highly with its true accuracy. Zero-cost proxies are currently designed by experts conducting multiple cycles of empirical testing on possible algorithms, datasets, and neural architecture design spaces. This experimentation lowers productivity and is an unsustainable approach towards zero-cost proxy design as deep learning use-cases diversify in nature. Additionally, existing zero-cost proxies fail to generalize across neural architecture design spaces. In this paper, we propose a genetic programming framework to automate the discovery of zero-cost proxies for neural architecture scoring. Our methodology efficiently discovers an interpretable and generalizable zero-cost proxy that gives state of the art score-accuracy correlation on all datasets and search spaces of NASBench-201 and Network Design Spaces (NDS). We believe that this research indicates a promising direction towards automatically discovering zero-cost proxies that can work across network architecture design spaces, datasets, and tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2022.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  2. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
  3. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  4. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  5. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  6. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 778
  7. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 666
  8. 2020NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 412
  9. 2018SNAS: Stochastic Neural Architecture Searchcited by 288
  10. 2020Neural Architecture Search without Trainingcited by 241
  11. 2021Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAScited by 194
  12. 2021Neural Architecture Search on ImageNet in Four GPU Hours: A Theoretically Inspired Perspectivecited by 168
13 more
  1. 2020AutoML-Zero: Evolving Machine Learning Algorithms From Scratchcited by 137
  2. 2020NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Sizecited by 98
  3. 2016Neuro-Symbolic Program Synthesiscited by 84
  4. 2019CARS: Continuous Evolution for Efficient Neural Architecture Searchcited by 79
  5. 2020DSNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search without Parameter Retrainingcited by 69
  6. 2019On Network Design Spaces for Visual Recognitioncited by 68
  7. 2020EcoNAS: Finding Proxies for Economical Neural Architecture Searchcited by 61
  8. 2020A Study on Encodings for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 37
  9. 2021GradSign: Model Performance Inference with Theoretical Insightscited by 18
  10. 2020DANCE: Differentiable Accelerator/Network Co-Explorationcited by 16
  11. 2020DNA: Differentiable Network-Accelerator Co-Searchcited by 11
  12. 2021Enabling NAS with Automated Super-Network Generationcited by 11
  13. 2021RHNAS: Realizable Hardware and Neural Architecture Searchcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: