Graph-to-Text Generation with Dynamic Structure Pruning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most graph-to-text works are built on the encoder-decoder framework with cross-attention mechanism. Recent studies have shown that explicitly modeling the input graph structure can significantly improve the performance. However, the vanilla structural encoder cannot capture all specialized information in a single forward pass for all decoding steps, resulting in inaccurate semantic representations. Meanwhile, the input graph is flatted as an unordered sequence in the cross attention, ignoring the original graph structure. As a result, the obtained input graph context vector in the decoder may be flawed. To address these issues, we propose a Structure-Aware Cross-Attention (SACA) mechanism to re-encode the input graph representation conditioning on the newly generated context at each decoding step in a structure aware manner. We further adapt SACA and introduce its variant Dynamic Graph Pruning (DGP) mechanism to dynamically drop irrelevant nodes in the decoding process. We achieve new state-of-the-art results on two graph-to-text datasets, LDC2020T02 and ENT-DESC, with only minor increase on computational cost.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2022.
Builds on
30 of 47 references.
References · 30
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2020MAD-X: An Adapter-Based Framework for Multi-Task Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 443
- 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
- 2019Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs with Graph Transformerscited by 122
18 more
- 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
- 2019Graph Transformer for Graph-to-Sequence Learningcited by 82
- 2020Leveraging Graph to Improve Abstractive Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 67
- 2019Long and Diverse Text Generation with Planning-based Hierarchical Variational Modelcited by 62
- 2018Graph-to-Sequence Learning using Gated Graph Neural Networkscited by 61
- 2018A Graph-to-Sequence Model for AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 56
- 2022A Survey on Text-to-SQL Parsing: Concepts, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 51
- 2021Structural Adapters in Pretrained Language Models for AMR-to-text Generationcited by 48
- 2020A Survey on Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base: Recent Advances and Challengescited by 47
- 2022S2SQL: Injecting Syntax to Question-Schema Interaction Graph Encoder for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 41
- 2019Modeling Graph Structure in Transformer for Better AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 35
- 2022Proton: Probing Schema Linking Information from Pre-trained Language Models for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 30
- 2019Densely Connected Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph-to-Sequence Learningcited by 29
- 2018Deep Graph Convolutional Encoders for Structured Data to Text Generationcited by 27
- 2020Towards a Decomposable Metric for Explainable Evaluation of Text Generation from AMRcited by 25
- 2019Structural Neural Encoders for AMR-to-text Generationcited by 19
- 2019Not All Attention Is Needed: Gated Attention Network for Sequence Datacited by 13
- 2020Lightweight, Dynamic Graph Convolutional Networks for AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)cited by 170
- 2024Unifying Structured Data as Graph for Data-to-Text Pre-Trainingcited by 13
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)31 Dec 2024
- 2024Unifying Structured Data as Graph for Data-to-Text Pre-Training2 Jan 2024