mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Out-of-Distribution Detection via Epistemic Uncertainty Adversarial Training

arXiv 2209.03148 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quantification of uncertainty is important for the adoption of machine learning, especially to reject out-of-distribution (OOD) data back to human experts for review. Yet progress has been slow, as a balance must be struck between computational efficiency and the quality of uncertainty estimates. For this reason many use deep ensembles of neural networks or Monte Carlo dropout for reasonable uncertainty estimates at relatively minimal compute and memory. Surprisingly, when we focus on the real-world applicable constraint of ≤ 1% false positive rate (FPR), prior methods fail to reliably detect OOD samples as such. Notably, even Gaussian random noise fails to trigger these popular OOD techniques. We help to alleviate this problem by devising a simple adversarial training scheme that incorporates an attack of the epistemic uncertainty predicted by the dropout ensemble. We demonstrate this method improves OOD detection performance on standard data (i.e., not adversarially crafted), and improves the standardized partial AUC from near-random guessing performance to ≥ 0.75.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2022.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  8. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  9. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  10. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  11. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  12. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
13 more
  1. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  2. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  3. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
  4. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  5. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
  6. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  7. 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
  8. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 211
  9. 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
  10. 2018Curriculum Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
  11. 2016Scalable Learning of Non-Decomposable Objectivescited by 40
  12. 2022Out of Distribution Data Detection Using Dropout Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 15
  13. 2021Leveraging Uncertainty for Improved Static Malware Detection Under Extreme False Positive Constraintscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.