GRASP: A Goodness-of-Fit Test for Classification Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance of classifiers is often measured in terms of average accuracy on test data. Despite being a standard measure, average accuracy fails in characterizing the fit of the model to the underlying conditional law of labels given the features vector (Y|X), e.g. due to model misspecification, over fitting, and high-dimensionality. In this paper, we consider the fundamental problem of assessing the goodness-of-fit for a general binary classifier. Our framework does not make any parametric assumption on the conditional law Y|X, and treats that as a black box oracle model which can be accessed only through queries. We formulate the goodness-of-fit assessment problem as a tolerance hypothesis testing of the form [ H0: mathbbEBig[DfBig(sf Bern(η(X))|sf Bern(hatη(X))Big)Big]≤ τ,, ] where Df represents an f-divergence function, and η(x), hatη(x) respectively denote the true and an estimate likelihood for a feature vector x admitting a positive label. We propose a novel test, called grasp for testing H0, which works in finite sample settings, no matter the features (distribution-free). We also propose model-X grasp designed for model-X settings where the joint distribution of the features vector is known. Model-X grasp uses this distributional information to achieve better power. We evaluate the performance of our tests through extensive numerical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2022.
Builds on
19 of 77 references.
References · 19
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
- 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 102
- 2014Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffscited by 97
- 2019Calibration tests in multi-class classification: A unifying frameworkcited by 79
- 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
- 2022T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive modelscited by 24
- 2016Online Rules for Control of False Discovery Rate and False Discovery Exceedancecited by 21
- 2018Robust inference with knockoffscited by 14
7 more
- 2017From Fixed-X to Random-X Regression: Bias-Variance Decompositions, Covariance Penalties, and Prediction Error Estimationcited by 12
- 2017Hypothesis Testing For Densities and High-Dimensional Multinomials: Sharp Local Minimax Ratescited by 11
- 2019Metropolized Knockoff Samplingcited by 10
- 2019Is a Classification Procedure Good Enough? A Goodness-of-Fit Assessment Tool for Classification Learningcited by 9
- 2019Goodness-of-fit testing in high-dimensional generalized linear modelscited by 8
- 2015Goodness of fit tests for high-dimensional linear modelscited by 5
- 2021Pearson Chi-squared Conditional Randomization Testcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.