mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GRASP: A Goodness-of-Fit Test for Classification Learning

arXiv 2209.02064 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2022stat.ME cs.LG math.STcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Performance of classifiers is often measured in terms of average accuracy on test data. Despite being a standard measure, average accuracy fails in characterizing the fit of the model to the underlying conditional law of labels given the features vector (Y|X), e.g. due to model misspecification, over fitting, and high-dimensionality. In this paper, we consider the fundamental problem of assessing the goodness-of-fit for a general binary classifier. Our framework does not make any parametric assumption on the conditional law Y|X, and treats that as a black box oracle model which can be accessed only through queries. We formulate the goodness-of-fit assessment problem as a tolerance hypothesis testing of the form [ H0: mathbbEBig[DfBig(sf Bern(η(X))|sf Bern(hatη(X))Big)Big]≤ τ,, ] where Df represents an f-divergence function, and η(x), hatη(x) respectively denote the true and an estimate likelihood for a feature vector x admitting a positive label. We propose a novel test, called grasp for testing H0, which works in finite sample settings, no matter the features (distribution-free). We also propose model-X grasp designed for model-X settings where the joint distribution of the features vector is known. Model-X grasp uses this distributional information to achieve better power. We evaluate the performance of our tests through extensive numerical experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2022.

Builds on

19 of 77 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
  3. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  4. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
  5. 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
  6. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 102
  7. 2014Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffscited by 97
  8. 2019Calibration tests in multi-class classification: A unifying frameworkcited by 79
  9. 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
  10. 2022T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive modelscited by 24
  11. 2016Online Rules for Control of False Discovery Rate and False Discovery Exceedancecited by 21
  12. 2018Robust inference with knockoffscited by 14
7 more
  1. 2017From Fixed-X to Random-X Regression: Bias-Variance Decompositions, Covariance Penalties, and Prediction Error Estimationcited by 12
  2. 2017Hypothesis Testing For Densities and High-Dimensional Multinomials: Sharp Local Minimax Ratescited by 11
  3. 2019Metropolized Knockoff Samplingcited by 10
  4. 2019Is a Classification Procedure Good Enough? A Goodness-of-Fit Assessment Tool for Classification Learningcited by 9
  5. 2019Goodness-of-fit testing in high-dimensional generalized linear modelscited by 8
  6. 2015Goodness of fit tests for high-dimensional linear modelscited by 5
  7. 2021Pearson Chi-squared Conditional Randomization Testcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.