mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Much User Context Do We Need? Privacy by Design in Mental Health NLP Application

arXiv 2209.02022 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2022cs.CL cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical NLP tasks such as mental health assessment from text, must take social constraints into account - the performance maximization must be constrained by the utmost importance of guaranteeing privacy of user data. Consumer protection regulations, such as GDPR, generally handle privacy by restricting data availability, such as requiring to limit user data to 'what is necessary' for a given purpose. In this work, we reason that providing stricter formal privacy guarantees, while increasing the volume of user data in the model, in most cases increases benefit for all parties involved, especially for the user. We demonstrate our arguments on two existing suicide risk assessment datasets of Twitter and Reddit posts. We present the first analysis juxtaposing user history length and differential privacy budgets and elaborate how modeling additional user context enables utility preservation while maintaining acceptable user privacy guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2022.

Builds on

25 of 84 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  4. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  5. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
  6. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  7. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  8. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  9. 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 104
  10. 2021Does BERT Pretrained on Clinical Notes Reveal Sensitive Data?cited by 91
  11. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  12. 2018Towards Robust and Privacy-preserving Text Representationscited by 75
13 more
  1. 2020Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacycited by 61
  2. 2018Privacy-preserving Neural Representations of Textcited by 54
  3. 2018Generalised Differential Privacy for Text Document Processingcited by 52
  4. 2020Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionatelycited by 52
  5. 2017Privacy Loss in Apple's Implementation of Differential Privacy on MacOS 10.12cited by 42
  6. 2018Three Tools for Practical Differential Privacycited by 20
  7. 2020Operationalizing the Legal Principle of Data Minimization for Personalizationcited by 19
  8. 2019I Am Not What I Write: Privacy Preserving Text Representation Learningcited by 12
  9. 2019Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving Text Representations for De-Identification of Medical Recordscited by 11
  10. 2013Differential Data Analysis for Recommender Systemscited by 3
  11. 2015Differential Privacy: An Estimation Theory-Based Method for Choosing Epsiloncited by 2
  12. 2017Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Researchcited by 2
  13. 2017Living Labs - An Ethical Challenge for Researchers and Platform Providerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.