Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving Text Representations for De-Identification of Medical Records
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
De-identification is the task of detecting protected health information (PHI) in medical text. It is a critical step in sanitizing electronic health records (EHRs) to be shared for research. Automatic de-identification classifierscan significantly speed up the sanitization process. However, obtaining a large and diverse dataset to train such a classifier that works wellacross many types of medical text poses a challenge as privacy laws prohibit the sharing of raw medical records. We introduce a method to create privacy-preserving shareable representations of medical text (i.e. they contain no PHI) that does not require expensive manual pseudonymization. These representations can be shared between organizations to create unified datasets for training de-identification models. Our representation allows training a simple LSTM-CRF de-identification model to an F1 score of 97.4%, which is comparable to a strong baseline that exposes private information in its representation. A robust, widely available de-identification classifier based on our representation could potentially enable studies for which de-identification would otherwise be too costly.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learningcited by 22
- 2022How to keep text private? A systematic review of deep learning methods for privacy-preserving natural language processingcited by 16
- 2021De-identification of Privacy-related Entities in Job Postingscited by 12
- 2022Differential Privacy in Natural Language Processing: The Story So Farcited by 12
- 2022Unsupervised Text Deidentificationcited by 11
- 2024Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for Clinical Text Anonymization: A Comparative Studycited by 7
- 2022Few-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer for Coarse-grained De-identification of Code-Mixed Clinical Textscited by 5
- 2022How Much User Context Do We Need? Privacy by Design in Mental Health NLP Applicationcited by 2
- 2026Paradox of De-identification: A Critique of HIPAA Safe Harbour in the Age of LLMscited by 1
- 2025Token-Level Privacy in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Private Vertical Federated Inference for Time-Seriescited by 0
- 2026Private Vertical Federated Inference for Time-Series8 May 2026
- 2026Paradox of De-identification: A Critique of HIPAA Safe Harbour in the Age of LLMs9 Feb 2026
- 2025Token-Level Privacy in Large Language Models5 Mar 2025
- 2024Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for Clinical Text Anonymization: A Comparative Study29 May 2024
- 2022Unsupervised Text Deidentification20 Oct 2022
- 2022How Much User Context Do We Need? Privacy by Design in Mental Health NLP Application5 Sep 2022
- 2022Differential Privacy in Natural Language Processing: The Story So Far17 Aug 2022
- 2022How to keep text private? A systematic review of deep learning methods for privacy-preserving natural language processing20 May 2022
- 2022Few-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer for Coarse-grained De-identification of Code-Mixed Clinical Texts10 Apr 2022
- 2021CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learning27 Aug 2021
- 2021De-identification of Privacy-related Entities in Job Postings24 May 2021