mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep learning automates bidimensional and volumetric tumor burden measurement from MRI in pre- and post-operative glioblastoma patients

arXiv 2209.01402 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tumor burden assessment by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is central to the evaluation of treatment response for glioblastoma. This assessment is complex to perform and associated with high variability due to the high heterogeneity and complexity of the disease. In this work, we tackle this issue and propose a deep learning pipeline for the fully automated end-to-end analysis of glioblastoma patients. Our approach simultaneously identifies tumor sub-regions, including the enhancing tumor, peritumoral edema and surgical cavity in the first step, and then calculates the volumetric and bidimensional measurements that follow the current Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Also, we introduce a rigorous manual annotation process which was followed to delineate the tumor sub-regions by the human experts, and to capture their segmentation confidences that are later used while training the deep learning models. The results of our extensive experimental study performed over 760 pre-operative and 504 post-operative adult patients with glioma obtained from the public database (acquired at 19 sites in years 2021-2020) and from a clinical treatment trial (47 and 69 sites for pre-/post-operative patients, 2009-2011) and backed up with thorough quantitative, qualitative and statistical analysis revealed that our pipeline performs accurate segmentation of pre- and post-operative MRIs in a fraction of the manual delineation time (up to 20 times faster than humans). The bidimensional and volumetric measurements were in strong agreement with expert radiologists, and we showed that RANO measurements are not always sufficient to quantify tumor burden.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2022.

Builds on

13 of 105 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
  3. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  4. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
  5. 2019Automated brain extraction of multi-sequence MRI using artificial neural networkscited by 134
  6. 2020nnU-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 103
  7. 2017A deep learning model integrating FCNNs and CRFs for brain tumor segmentationcited by 35
  8. 2018Cascaded V-Net using ROI masks for brain tumor segmentationcited by 26
  9. 2022Cross-Modality Deep Feature Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 22
  10. 2020DeepSeg: Deep Neural Network Framework for Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation using Magnetic Resonance FLAIR Imagescited by 21
  11. 2019Machine Learning Techniques for Biomedical Image Segmentation: An Overview of Technical Aspects and Introduction to State-of-Art Applicationscited by 17
  12. 2013GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platformcited by 10
1 more
  1. 2019Fully-automated deep learning-powered system for DCE-MRI analysis of brain tumorscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.