Towards a deep learning approach for classifying treatment response in glioblastomas
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Glioblastomas are the most aggressive type of glioma, having a 5-year survival rate of 6.9%. Treatment typically involves surgery, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and frequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to monitor disease progression. To assess treatment response, radiologists use the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria to categorize the tumor into one of four labels based on imaging and clinical features: complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. This assessment is very complex and time-consuming. Since deep learning (DL) has been widely used to tackle classification problems, this work aimed to implement the first DL pipeline for the classification of RANO criteria based on two consecutive MRI acquisitions. The models were trained and tested on the open dataset LUMIERE. Five approaches were tested: 1) subtraction of input images, 2) different combinations of modalities, 3) different model architectures, 4) different pretraining tasks, and 5) adding clinical data. The pipeline that achieved the best performance used a Densenet264 considering only T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images as input without any pretraining. A median Balanced Accuracy of 50.96% was achieved. Additionally, explainability methods were applied. Using Saliency Maps, the tumor region was often successfully highlighted. In contrast, Grad-CAM typically failed to highlight the tumor region, with some exceptions observed in the Complete Response and Progressive Disease classes, where it effectively identified the tumor region. These results set a benchmark for future studies on glioblastoma treatment response assessment based on the RANO criteria while emphasizing the heterogeneity of factors that might play a role when assessing the tumor's response to treatment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2025.
Builds on
13 of 71 references.
References · 13
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
- 2022MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcarecited by 448
- 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 422
- 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 288
- 2018An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRIcited by 140
- 2023Federated Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 78
- 20203D Deep Learning on Medical Images: A Reviewcited by 76
- 2019DC-AL GAN: Pseudoprogression and True Tumor Progression of Glioblastoma Multiform Image Classification Based on DCGAN and AlexNetcited by 6
- 2025A Self-supervised Multimodal Deep Learning Approach to Differentiate Post-radiotherapy Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastomacited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.