mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Swin-transformer-yolov5 For Real-time Wine Grape Bunch Detection

arXiv 2208.14508 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this research, an integrated detection model, Swin-transformer-YOLOv5 or Swin-T-YOLOv5, was proposed for real-time wine grape bunch detection to inherit the advantages from both YOLOv5 and Swin-transformer. The research was conducted on two different grape varieties of Chardonnay (always white berry skin) and Merlot (white or white-red mix berry skin when immature; red when matured) from July to September in 2019. To verify the superiority of Swin-T-YOLOv5, its performance was compared against several commonly used/competitive object detectors, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv3, YOLOv4, and YOLOv5. All models were assessed under different test conditions, including two different weather conditions (sunny and cloudy), two different berry maturity stages (immature and mature), and three different sunlight directions/intensities (morning, noon, and afternoon) for a comprehensive comparison. Additionally, the predicted number of grape bunches by Swin-T-YOLOv5 was further compared with ground truth values, including both in-field manual counting and manual labeling during the annotation process. Results showed that the proposed Swin-T-YOLOv5 outperformed all other studied models for grape bunch detection, with up to 97% of mean Average Precision (mAP) and 0.89 of F1-score when the weather was cloudy. This mAP was approximately 44%, 18%, 14%, and 4% greater than Faster R-CNN, YOLOv3, YOLOv4, and YOLOv5, respectively. Swin-T-YOLOv5 achieved its lowest mAP (90%) and F1-score (0.82) when detecting immature berries, where the mAP was approximately 40%, 5%, 3%, and 1% greater than the same. Furthermore, Swin-T-YOLOv5 performed better on Chardonnay variety with achieved up to 0.91 of R2 and 2.36 root mean square error (RMSE) when comparing the predictions with ground truth. However, it underperformed on Merlot variety with achieved only up to 0.70 of R2 and 3.30 of RMSE.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2022.

Builds on

29 of 53 references.

References · 29

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  5. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  6. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  7. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  9. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
  10. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  11. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  12. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
17 more
  1. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  2. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
  3. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 823
  4. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
  5. 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 723
  6. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  7. 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
  8. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  9. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  10. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  11. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  12. 2020Exploring Self-attention for Image Recognitioncited by 313
  13. 2020Scaled-YOLOv4: Scaling Cross Stage Partial Networkcited by 211
  14. 2017Dual Path Networkscited by 119
  15. 2019Imbalance Problems in Object Detection: A Reviewcited by 118
  16. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning-based Object Detectioncited by 106
  17. 2022SwinNet: Swin Transformer drives edge-aware RGB-D and RGB-T salient object detectioncited by 59

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.