mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applications

arXiv 2208.14417 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2022cs.LG cs.CR stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standardized datasets and benchmarks have spurred innovations in computer vision, natural language processing, multi-modal and tabular settings. We note that, as compared to other well researched fields, fraud detection has unique challenges: high-class imbalance, diverse feature types, frequently changing fraud patterns, and adversarial nature of the problem. Due to these, the modeling approaches evaluated on datasets from other research fields may not work well for the fraud detection. In this paper, we introduce Fraud Dataset Benchmark (FDB), a compilation of publicly available datasets catered to fraud detection FDB comprises variety of fraud related tasks, ranging from identifying fraudulent card-not-present transactions, detecting bot attacks, classifying malicious URLs, estimating risk of loan default to content moderation. The Python based library for FDB provides a consistent API for data loading with standardized training and testing splits. We demonstrate several applications of FDB that are of broad interest for fraud detection, including feature engineering, comparison of supervised learning algorithms, label noise removal, class-imbalance treatment and semi-supervised learning. We hope that FDB provides a common playground for researchers and practitioners in the fraud detection domain to develop robust and customized machine learning techniques targeting various fraud use cases.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2022.

Builds on

13 of 64 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  6. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  7. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
  8. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
  9. 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
  10. 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 86
  11. 2019An Open Source AutoML Benchmarkcited by 85
  12. 2021Benchmarking Multimodal AutoML for Tabular Data with Text Fieldscited by 26
1 more
  1. 2019AutoML @ NeurIPS 2018 challenge: Design and Resultscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.