When Similarity Is Interaction-Driven: Quantum Kernels for Regime-Sensitive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Similarity in many decision systems is governed not by distance alone but by interactions among variables. In fraud and anomaly detection, small local perturbations can cross interaction-sensitive decision boundaries while leaving ambient distance almost unchanged. Motivated by this setting, we introduce a thin-slab interaction model and an interaction-driven quantum kernel constructed from entangled Pauli-string feature maps. The feature map explicitly encodes sparse high-order block interactions. We show that the resulting fidelity kernel is positive semidefinite, admits an exact block-factorized formulation, and induces a geometry sensitive to changes in interaction regime. Across balanced and imbalanced synthetic experiments spanning third-, fourth-, sixth-, and eighth-order interactions, the proposed kernel consistently outperforms linear, radial basis function, Laplacian, and polynomial kernels, as well as an engineered-interaction linear baseline supplied with the planted block products. On real fraud-detection benchmarks, it achieves the highest mean accuracy and F1 on Credit Card Fraud Detection and ranks second on IEEE-CIS Fraud Detection. Executed on a 156-qubit IBM Quantum processor in a fourth-order setting, the hardware-estimated kernel matches the noise-free simulator within seed-to-seed variability and retains its advantage over the baselines. These findings show that quantum-kernel performance depends on alignment between feature-map geometry and the underlying predictive structure, rather than on Hilbert-space dimension alone. Because the prescribed block-factorized kernel can also be evaluated exactly on a classical computer, the results establish predictive and representational value rather than computational quantum speedup.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.
Builds on
10 of 27 references.
References · 10
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
- 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 216
- 2017Neural Factorization Machines for Sparse Predictive Analyticscited by 183
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 91
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 90
- 2023Hybrid Genetic Optimisation for Quantum Feature Map Designcited by 8
- 2020Credit card fraud detection using machine learning: A surveycited by 7
- 2022Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applicationscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.