Textwash -- automated open-source text anonymisation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increased use of text data in social science research has benefited from easy-to-access data (e.g., Twitter). That trend comes at the cost of research requiring sensitive but hard-to-share data (e.g., interview data, police reports, electronic health records). We introduce a solution to that stalemate with the open-source text anonymisation software_Textwash_. This paper presents the empirical evaluation of the tool using the TILD criteria: a technical evaluation (how accurate is the tool?), an information loss evaluation (how much information is lost in the anonymisation process?) and a de-anonymisation test (can humans identify individuals from anonymised text data?). The findings suggest that Textwash performs similar to state-of-the-art entity recognition models and introduces a negligible information loss of 0.84%. For the de-anonymisation test, we tasked humans to identify individuals by name from a dataset of crowdsourced person descriptions of very famous, semi-famous and non-existing individuals. The de-anonymisation rate ranged from 1.01-2.01% for the realistic use cases of the tool. We replicated the findings in a second study and concluded that Textwash succeeds in removing potentially sensitive information that renders detailed person descriptions practically anonymous.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2022.
Builds on
10 of 37 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
- 2020With Little Power Comes Great Responsibilitycited by 142
- 2020Frequency-Guided Word Substitutions for Detecting Textual Adversarial Examplescited by 54
- 2020Which *BERT? A Survey Organizing Contextualized Encoderscited by 26
- 2013Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehosecited by 16
- 2020Measuring Emotions in the COVID-19 Real World Worry Datasetcited by 15
- 2021No Intruder, no Validity: Evaluation Criteria for Privacy-Preserving Text Anonymizationcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2023Quantifying Association Capabilities of Large Language Models and Its Implications on Privacy Leakagecited by 28
- 2024Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and Countermeasurescited by 12
- 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024NAP^2: A Benchmark for Naturalness and Privacy-Preserving Text Rewriting by Learning from Humancited by 8
- 2025A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymizationcited by 5
- 2025How do we measure privacy in text? A survey of text anonymization metricscited by 5
- 2024Silencing the Risk, Not the Whistle: A Semi-automated Text Sanitization Tool for Mitigating the Risk of Whistleblower Re-Identificationcited by 0
- 2025Protecting De-identified Documents from Search-based Linkage Attackscited by 0
- 2026Generative Confidants: How do People Experience Trust in Emotional Support from Generative AI?cited by 0
- 2026The Conundrum of Trustworthy Research on Attacking Personally Identifiable Information Removal Techniquescited by 0
- 2026PrivBench: A Holistic and Modular Benchmarking Platform for Evaluating Text-to-Text Privatizationcited by 0
- 2026PrivBench: A Holistic and Modular Benchmarking Platform for Evaluating Text-to-Text Privatization30 Aug 2026
- 2026The Conundrum of Trustworthy Research on Attacking Personally Identifiable Information Removal Techniques9 Mar 2026
- 2026Generative Confidants: How do People Experience Trust in Emotional Support from Generative AI?23 Jan 2026
- 2025How do we measure privacy in text? A survey of text anonymization metrics30 Nov 2025
- 2025Protecting De-identified Documents from Search-based Linkage Attacks7 Oct 2025
- 2025A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymization29 Aug 2025
- 2024Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and Countermeasures14 Aug 2024
- 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models16 Jul 2024
- 2024NAP^2: A Benchmark for Naturalness and Privacy-Preserving Text Rewriting by Learning from Human6 Jun 2024
- 2024Silencing the Risk, Not the Whistle: A Semi-automated Text Sanitization Tool for Mitigating the Risk of Whistleblower Re-Identification2 May 2024
- 2023Quantifying Association Capabilities of Large Language Models and Its Implications on Privacy Leakage22 May 2023