mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Textwash -- automated open-source text anonymisation

arXiv 2208.13081 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2022cs.CL cs.CYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increased use of text data in social science research has benefited from easy-to-access data (e.g., Twitter). That trend comes at the cost of research requiring sensitive but hard-to-share data (e.g., interview data, police reports, electronic health records). We introduce a solution to that stalemate with the open-source text anonymisation software_Textwash_. This paper presents the empirical evaluation of the tool using the TILD criteria: a technical evaluation (how accurate is the tool?), an information loss evaluation (how much information is lost in the anonymisation process?) and a de-anonymisation test (can humans identify individuals from anonymised text data?). The findings suggest that Textwash performs similar to state-of-the-art entity recognition models and introduces a negligible information loss of 0.84%. For the de-anonymisation test, we tasked humans to identify individuals by name from a dataset of crowdsourced person descriptions of very famous, semi-famous and non-existing individuals. The de-anonymisation rate ranged from 1.01-2.01% for the realistic use cases of the tool. We replicated the findings in a second study and concluded that Textwash succeeds in removing potentially sensitive information that renders detailed person descriptions practically anonymous.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2022.

Builds on

10 of 37 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  5. 2020With Little Power Comes Great Responsibilitycited by 142
  6. 2020Frequency-Guided Word Substitutions for Detecting Textual Adversarial Examplescited by 54
  7. 2020Which *BERT? A Survey Organizing Contextualized Encoderscited by 26
  8. 2013Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehosecited by 16
  9. 2020Measuring Emotions in the COVID-19 Real World Worry Datasetcited by 15
  10. 2021No Intruder, no Validity: Evaluation Criteria for Privacy-Preserving Text Anonymizationcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

11 papers.