mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Testing and Validation of Level of Detail Reductions Through Supervised Learning

arXiv 2208.12674 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2022cs.GR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern video games are rapidly growing in size and scale, and to create rich and interesting environments, a large amount of content is needed. As a consequence, often several thousands of detailed 3D assets are used to create a single scene. As each asset's polygon mesh can contain millions of polygons, the number of polygons that need to be drawn every frame may exceed several billions. Therefore, the computational resources often limit how many detailed objects that can be displayed in a scene. To push this limit and to optimize performance one can reduce the polygon count of the assets when possible. Basically, the idea is that an object at farther distance from the capturing camera, consequently with relatively smaller screen size, its polygon count may be reduced without affecting the perceived quality. Level of Detail (LOD) refers to the complexity level of a 3D model representation. The process of removing complexity is often called LOD reduction and can be done automatically with an algorithm or by hand by artists. However, this process may lead to deterioration of the visual quality if the different LODs differ significantly, or if LOD reduction transition is not seamless. Today the validation of these results is mainly done manually requiring an expert to visually inspect the results. However, this process is slow, mundane, and therefore prone to error. Herein we propose a method to automate this process based on the use of deep convolutional networks. We report promising results and envision that this method can be used to automate the process of LOD reduction testing and validation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2022.

Builds on

14 of 35 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  5. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
  6. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  7. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
  8. 2018PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preferencecited by 160
  9. 2020Understanding SSIMcited by 77
  10. 2021Augmenting Automated Game Testing with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
  11. 2018Automated Playtesting with Procedural Personas through MCTS with Evolved Heuristicscited by 28
  12. 2021Improving Playtesting Coverage via Curiosity Driven Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 28
2 more
  1. 2021Appearance-Driven Automatic 3D Model Simplificationcited by 24
  2. 2021Subjective and Objective Visual Quality Assessment of Textured 3D Meshescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.