mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep neural networks for fast acquisition of aortic 3D pressure and velocity flow fields

arXiv 2208.12156 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2022physics.flu-dyn cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be used to simulate vascular haemodynamics and analyse potential treatment options. CFD has shown to be beneficial in improving patient outcomes. However, the implementation of CFD for routine clinical use is yet to be realised. Barriers for CFD include high computational resources, specialist experience needed for designing simulation set-ups, and long processing times. The aim of this study was to explore the use of machine learning (ML) to replicate conventional aortic CFD with automatic and fast regression models. Data used to train/test the model consisted of 3,000 CFD simulations performed on synthetically generated 3D aortic shapes. These subjects were generated from a statistical shape model (SSM) built on real patient-specific aortas (N=67). Inference performed on 200 test shapes resulted in average errors of 6.01% +/-3.12 SD and 3.99% +/-0.93 SD for pressure and velocity, respectively. Our ML-based models performed CFD in +/-0.075 seconds (4,000x faster than the solver). This proof-of-concept study shows that results from conventional vascular CFD can be reproduced using ML at a much faster rate, in an automatic process, and with high accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2022.

Builds on

6 of 58 references.

References · 6

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  3. 2017Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overviewcited by 590
  4. 2018Generating 3D faces using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoderscited by 268
  5. 2016Mean Absolute Percentage Error for regression modelscited by 58
  6. 2015A Combined Deep-Learning and Deformable-Model Approach to Fully Automatic Segmentation of the Left Ventricle in Cardiac MRIcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Unsteady Aneurysm Hemodynamics with Physics-Informed DeepONets
  2. 2025AortaDiff: Volume-Guided Conditional Diffusion Models for Multi-Branch Aortic Surface Generation
  3. 2026Inpainting physics: self-supervised learning for context-driven fluid simulation
  4. 2026FluidFlow: a flow-matching generative model for fluid dynamics surrogates on unstructured meshes
  5. 20253D Cardiac Anatomy Generation Using Mesh Latent Diffusion Models
  6. 2024Inpainting Computational Fluid Dynamics with Deep Learning
  7. 2026FalconBC: Flow matching for Amortized inference of Latent-CONditioned physiologic Boundary Conditions
  8. 2026Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation ↗