Adversarial Vulnerability of Temporal Feature Networks for Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Taking into account information across the temporal domain helps to improve environment perception in autonomous driving. However, it has not been studied so far whether temporally fused neural networks are vulnerable to deliberately generated perturbations, i.e. adversarial attacks, or whether temporal history is an inherent defense against them. In this work, we study whether temporal feature networks for object detection are vulnerable to universal adversarial attacks. We evaluate attacks of two types: imperceptible noise for the whole image and locally-bound adversarial patch. In both cases, perturbations are generated in a white-box manner using PGD. Our experiments confirm, that attacking even a portion of a temporal input suffices to fool the network. We visually assess generated perturbations to gain insights into the functioning of attacks. To enhance the robustness, we apply adversarial training using 5-PGD. Our experiments on KITTI and nuScenes datasets demonstrate, that a model robustified via K-PGD is able to withstand the studied attacks while keeping the mAP-based performance comparable to that of an unattacked model.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.
Builds on
28 of 34 references.
References · 28
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,431
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
16 more
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
- 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 183
- 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
- 2019On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detectioncited by 93
- 2017Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 92
- 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 87
- 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving against Real-World Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 55
- 2021Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Drivingcited by 45
- 2017DSOD: Learning Deeply Supervised Object Detectors from Scratchcited by 41
- 2018Defending Against Universal Perturbations With Shared Adversarial Trainingcited by 25
- 2022Feasibility of Inconspicuous GAN-generated Adversarial Patches against Object Detectioncited by 13
- 2020Investigating Vulnerability to Adversarial Examples on Multimodal Data Fusion in Deep Learningcited by 11
- 2021Temporal Feature Networks for CNN based Object Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.