mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Exploratory Study of Tweets about the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant: Insights from Sentiment Analysis, Language Interpretation, Source Tracking, Type Classification, and Embedded URL Detection

arXiv 2208.10252 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2022cs.CL cs.LG cs.SIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents the findings of an exploratory study on the continuously generating Big Data on Twitter related to the sharing of information, news, views, opinions, ideas, feedback, and experiences about the COVID-19 pandemic, with a specific focus on the Omicron variant, which is the globally dominant variant of SARS-CoV-2 at this time. A total of 12028 tweets about the Omicron variant were studied, and the specific characteristics of tweets that were analyzed include - sentiment, language, source, type, and embedded URLs. The findings of this study are manifold. First, from sentiment analysis, it was observed that 50.5% of tweets had a neutral emotion. The other emotions - bad, good, terrible, and great were found in 15.6%, 14.0%, 12.5%, and 7.5% of the tweets, respectively. Second, the findings of language interpretation showed that 65.9% of the tweets were posted in English. It was followed by Spanish, French, Italian, and other languages. Third, the findings from source tracking showed that Twitter for Android was associated with 35.2% of tweets. It was followed by Twitter Web App, Twitter for iPhone, Twitter for iPad, and other sources. Fourth, studying the type of tweets revealed that retweets accounted for 60.8% of the tweets, it was followed by original tweets and replies that accounted for 19.8% and 19.4% of the tweets, respectively. Fifth, in terms of embedded URL analysis, the most common domain embedded in the tweets was found to be twitter.com, which was followed by biorxiv.org, nature.com, and other domains. Finally, to support similar research in this field, we have developed a Twitter dataset that comprises more than 500,000 tweets about the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant since the first detected case of this variant on November 24, 2021.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 137 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2022.

Builds on

15 of 137 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Evaluation of Session-based Recommendation Algorithmscited by 37
  2. 2020#Election2020: The First Public Twitter Dataset on the 2020 US Presidential Electioncited by 18
  3. 2020ALONE: A Dataset for Toxic Behavior among Adolescents on Twittercited by 17
  4. 2020ArCOV19-Rumors: Arabic COVID-19 Twitter Dataset for Misinformation Detectioncited by 15
  5. 2020Large Arabic Twitter Dataset on COVID-19cited by 10
  6. 2017Catching Zika Fever: Application of Crowdsourcing and Machine Learning for Tracking Health Misinformation on Twittercited by 8
  7. 2022Twitter Dataset for 2022 Russo-Ukrainian Crisiscited by 6
  8. 2020Covid-Transformer: Detecting COVID-19 Trending Topics on Twitter Using Universal Sentence Encodercited by 5
  9. 2020Social Media Mining Toolkit (SMMT)cited by 4
  10. 2014Who Will Retweet This? Automatically Identifying and Engaging Strangers on Twitter to Spread Informationcited by 3
  11. 2020Natural Hazards Twitter Datasetcited by 3
  12. 2017Detecting and monitoring foodborne illness outbreaks: Twitter communications and the 2015 U.S. Salmonella outbreak linked to imported cucumberscited by 2
3 more
  1. 2020A large-scale Twitter dataset for drug safety applications mined from publicly existing resourcescited by 2
  2. 2020Dutch General Public Reaction on Governmental COVID-19 Measures and Announcements in Twitter Datacited by 1
  3. 2021BOTTER: A framework to analyze social bots in Twittercited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2.

7 papers.