ILLUME: Rationalizing Vision-Language Models through Human Interactions
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Bootstrapping from pre-trained language models has been proven to be an efficient approach for building vision-language models (VLM) for tasks such as image captioning or visual question answering. However, outputs of these models rarely align with user's rationales for specific answers. In order to improve this alignment and reinforce commonsense reasons, we propose a tuning paradigm based on human interactions with machine-generated data. Our ILLUME executes the following loop: Given an image-question-answer prompt, the VLM samples multiple candidate rationales, and a human critic provides feedback via preference selection, used for fine-tuning. This loop increases the training data and gradually carves out the VLM's rationalization capabilities that are aligned with human intent. Our exhaustive experiments demonstrate that ILLUME is competitive with standard supervised finetuning while using significantly fewer training data and only requiring minimal feedback.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2022.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
- 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 742
- 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
17 more
- 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 553
- 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
- 2019WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scalecited by 194
- 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
- 2021Alignment of Language Agentscited by 167
- 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
- 2020Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering with Self-Talkcited by 161
- 2021Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Modelscited by 159
- 2022Can Machines Help Us Answering Question 16 in Datasheets, and In Turn Reflecting on Inappropriate Content?cited by 150
- 2019"Going on a vacation" takes longer than "Going for a walk": A Study of Temporal Commonsense Understandingcited by 121
- 2022On the Paradox of Learning to Reason from Datacited by 93
- 2021MAGMA -- Multimodal Augmentation of Generative Models through Adapter-based Finetuningcited by 85
- 2018Faithful Multimodal Explanation for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
- 2021Neuro-Symbolic Forward Reasoningcited by 16
- 2022CLEVR-X: A Visual Reasoning Dataset for Natural Language Explanationscited by 16
- 2022A Typology for Exploring the Mitigation of Shortcut Behaviorcited by 7
- 2016Measuring Machine Intelligence Through Visual Question Answeringcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Learning by Self-Explainingcited by 17
- 2023MultiFusion: Fusing Pre-Trained Models for Multi-Lingual, Multi-Modal Image Generationcited by 14
- 2025Is Safety Standard Same for Everyone? User-Specific Safety Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Trustworthy AI-based crack-tip segmentation using domain-guided explanationscited by 0
- 2026Towards reliable multimodal disaster severity assessment through preference optimization and explainable vision-language reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Towards reliable multimodal disaster severity assessment through preference optimization and explainable vision-language reasoning1 Sep 2026
- 2025Trustworthy AI-based crack-tip segmentation using domain-guided explanations28 Jul 2025
- 2025Is Safety Standard Same for Everyone? User-Specific Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models20 Feb 2025
- 2023Learning by Self-Explaining15 Sep 2023
- 2023MultiFusion: Fusing Pre-Trained Models for Multi-Lingual, Multi-Modal Image Generation24 May 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions
- 2025Human Uncertainty-Aware Data Selection and Automatic Labeling in Visual Question Answering
- 2023Language Models as Black-Box Optimizers for Vision-Language Models
- 2025Analyzing the Sensitivity of Vision Language Models in Visual Question Answering
- 2025Feedback-Driven Vision-Language Alignment with Minimal Human Supervision
- 2024Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation with Flexible Complexity by Vision-Language Bootstrapping
- 2024How Vision-Language Tasks Benefit from Large Pre-trained Models: A Survey
- 2026Do Vision-Language Models See or Guess? Measuring and Reducing Textual-Prior Reliance with a Phrasing-Controlled Benchmark