A Concept and Argumentation based Interpretable Model in High Risk Domains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpretability has become an essential topic for artificial intelligence in some high-risk domains such as healthcare, bank and security. For commonly-used tabular data, traditional methods trained end-to-end machine learning models with numerical and categorical data only, and did not leverage human understandable knowledge such as data descriptions. Yet mining human-level knowledge from tabular data and using it for prediction remain a challenge. Therefore, we propose a concept and argumentation based model (CAM) that includes the following two components: a novel concept mining method to obtain human understandable concepts and their relations from both descriptions of features and the underlying data, and a quantitative argumentation-based method to do knowledge representation and reasoning. As a result of it, CAM provides decisions that are based on human-level knowledge and the reasoning process is intrinsically interpretable. Finally, to visualize the purposed interpretable model, we provide a dialogical explanation that contain dominated reasoning path within CAM. Experimental results on both open source benchmark dataset and real-word business dataset show that (1) CAM is transparent and interpretable, and the knowledge inside the CAM is coherent with human understanding; (2) Our interpretable approach can reach competitive results comparing with other state-of-art models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2022.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
- 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 515
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
- 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
- 2021DANets: Deep Abstract Networks for Tabular Data Classification and Regressioncited by 50
- 2020How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?cited by 44
5 more
- 2019AutoCross: Automatic Feature Crossing for Tabular Data in Real-World Applicationscited by 39
- 2020Interpreting Neural Networks as Gradual Argumentation Frameworks (Including Proof Appendix)cited by 38
- 2018An Interpretable Model with Globally Consistent Explanations for Credit Riskcited by 33
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusionscited by 4
- 2021Beyond Importance Scores: Interpreting Tabular ML by Visualizing Feature Semanticscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models
- 2022Interpretable by Design: Learning Predictors by Composing Interpretable Queries
- 2026ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold
- 2025DecisionFlow: Advancing Large Language Model as Principled Decision Maker
- 2025Knowledge-Augmented Large Language Model Agents for Explainable Financial Decision-Making
- 2025Reasoning based on symbolic and parametric knowledge bases: a survey
- 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspective
- 2022Towards Benchmarking Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods