Reduced Implication-bias Logic Loss for Neuro-Symbolic Learning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Integrating logical reasoning and machine learning by approximating logical inference with differentiable operators is a widely used technique in Neuro-Symbolic systems. However, some differentiable operators could bring a significant bias during backpropagation and degrade the performance of Neuro-Symbolic learning. In this paper, we reveal that this bias, named textitImplication Bias is common in loss functions derived from fuzzy logic operators. Furthermore, we propose a simple yet effective method to transform the biased loss functions into textitReduced Implication-bias Logic Loss (RILL) to address the above problem. Empirical study shows that RILL can achieve significant improvements compared with the biased logic loss functions, especially when the knowledge base is incomplete, and keeps more robust than the compared methods when labelled data is insufficient.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2022.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,156
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 394
- 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 270
- 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 199
- 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
- 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Logic Operatorscited by 101
4 more
- 2020From Statistical Relational to Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligencecited by 63
- 2019Augmenting Neural Networks with First-order Logiccited by 51
- 2021MultiplexNet: Towards Fully Satisfied Logical Constraints in Neural Networkscited by 44
- 2019On the relation between Loss Functions and T-Normscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025A Learnability Analysis on Neuro-Symbolic Learningcited by 3
- 2026Candidate Retention for Abductive Learningcited by 0
- 2026Candidate Retention for Abductive Learning30 Sep 2026
- 2025A Learnability Analysis on Neuro-Symbolic Learning21 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Differentiable Logic Programming to Mitigate Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Systems
- 2025Logic of Hypotheses: from Zero to Full Knowledge in Neurosymbolic Integration
- 2024Neuro-symbolic Learning Yielding Logical Constraints
- 2026NSFL: A Post-Training Neuro-Symbolic Fuzzy Logic Framework for Boolean Operators in Neural Embeddings
- 2022NeuPSL: Neural Probabilistic Soft Logic
- 2023Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Shortcuts: Mitigation Strategies and their Limitations
- 2025A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning
- 2026IFDNS: An Iterative Feedback-Driven Neuro-Symbolic Method for Faithful Logical Reasoning