IFDNS: An Iterative Feedback-Driven Neuro-Symbolic Method for Faithful Logical Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of reasoning tasks, including logical and mathematical problem-solving. While prompt-based methods like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) can enhance LLM reasoning abilities to some extent, they often suffer from a lack of faithfulness, where the derived conclusions may not align with the generated reasoning chain. To address this issue, researchers have explored neuro-symbolic approaches to bolster LLM logical reasoning capabilities. However, existing neuro-symbolic methods still face challenges with information loss during the process. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Iterative Feedback-Driven Neuro-Symbolic (IFDNS), a novel prompt-based method that employs a multi-round feedback mechanism to address LLM limitations in handling complex logical relationships. IFDNS utilizes iterative feedback during the logic extraction phase to accurately extract causal relationship statements and translate them into propositional and logical implication expressions, effectively mitigating information loss issues. Furthermore, IFDNS is orthogonal to existing prompt methods, allowing for seamless integration with various prompting approaches. Empirical evaluations across six datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of IFDNS in significantly improving the performance of CoT and Chain-of-Thought with Self-Consistency (CoT-SC). Specifically, IFDNS achieves a +9.40% accuracy boost for CoT on the LogiQA dataset and a +11.70% improvement for CoT-SC on the PrOntoQA dataset.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 33 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.
Builds on
33 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2024IFAR: Multi-Perspective and Multi-Level Causal Discovery with LLMs9 Sep
- 2023LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Provers23 Oct
- 2023Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Models8 Aug
- 2023GPT-4 Can't Reason21 Jul
- 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning20 May
- 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-47 Apr
- 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought3 Oct
- 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logic2 Sep
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models30 Nov
Other references · 24
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
- 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
- 2023Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 285
- 2020Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Languagecited by 265
- 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
12 more
- 2023SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 157
- 2024Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGIcited by 127
- 2024Premise Order Matters in Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 71
- 2020LogiQA: A Challenge Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehension with Logical Reasoningcited by 68
- 2021Logic-Driven Context Extension and Data Augmentation for Logical Reasoning of Textcited by 46
- 2024How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning?cited by 34
- 2023Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughtscited by 27
- 2024Logic-of-Thought: Injecting Logic into Contexts for Full Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2024Wrong-of-Thought: An Integrated Reasoning Framework with Multi-Perspective Verification and Wrong Informationcited by 10
- 2024Derailer-Rerailer: Adaptive Verification for Efficient and Reliable Language Model Reasoningcited by 9
- 2025Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Across Large Language Models: A Fine-Grained Approachcited by 8
- 2024Judgment-of-Thought Prompting: A Courtroom-Inspired Framework for Binary Logical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for Hypothetical Deduction in Logical Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Towards Improving the Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models
- 2025Adaptive LLM-Symbolic Reasoning via Dynamic Logical Solver Composition
- 2025A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning
- 2026Logical Phase Transitions: Understanding Collapse in LLM Logical Reasoning
- 2026Logic-Parametric Neuro-Symbolic NLI: Controlling Logical Formalisms for Verifiable LLM Reasoning
- 2026NeuroProlog: Multi-Task Fine-Tuning for Neurosymbolic Mathematical Reasoning via the Cocktail Effect
- 2026UFAL-CUNI at SemEval-2026 Task 11: An Efficient Modular Neuro-symbolic Method for Syllogistic Reasoning