mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structural Biases for Improving Transformers on Translation into Morphologically Rich Languages

arXiv 2208.06061 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2022cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine translation has seen rapid progress with the advent of Transformer-based models. These models have no explicit linguistic structure built into them, yet they may still implicitly learn structured relationships by attending to relevant tokens. We hypothesize that this structural learning could be made more robust by explicitly endowing Transformers with a structural bias, and we investigate two methods for building in such a bias. One method, the TP-Transformer, augments the traditional Transformer architecture to include an additional component to represent structure. The second method imbues structure at the data level by segmenting the data with morphological tokenization. We test these methods on translating from English into morphologically rich languages, Turkish and Inuktitut, and consider both automatic metrics and human evaluations. We find that each of these two approaches allows the network to achieve better performance, but this improvement is dependent on the size of the dataset. In sum, structural encoding methods make Transformers more sample-efficient, enabling them to perform better from smaller amounts of data.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2022.

Builds on

21 of 43 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  3. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  4. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  6. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
  7. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
  8. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
  9. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
  10. 2018The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Recent Advances in Neural Machine Translationcited by 102
  11. 2019What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?cited by 50
  12. 2020Very Deep Transformers for Neural Machine Translationcited by 50
9 more
  1. 2016Linguistic Input Features Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
  2. 2019Enhancing the Transformer with Explicit Relational Encoding for Math Problem Solvingcited by 35
  3. 2019Discovering the Compositional Structure of Vector Representations with Role Learning Networkscited by 34
  4. 2018Learning to Reason with Third-Order Tensor Productscited by 27
  5. 2018RNNs Implicitly Implement Tensor Product Representationscited by 26
  6. 2019Enhancing Machine Translation with Dependency-Aware Self-Attentioncited by 24
  7. 2017Question-Answering with Grammatically-Interpretable Representationscited by 8
  8. 2019A Latent Morphology Model for Open-Vocabulary Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  9. 2018Improving Character-based Decoding Using Target-Side Morphological Information for Neural Machine Translationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

5 papers.