mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Weight Similarity of Neural Networks via Chain Normalization Rule and Hypothesis-Training-Testing

arXiv 2208.04369 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2022cs.LG cs.CV math.STcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a weight similarity measure method that can quantify the weight similarity of non-convex neural networks. To understand the weight similarity of different trained models, we propose to extract the feature representation from the weights of neural networks. We first normalize the weights of neural networks by introducing a chain normalization rule, which is used for weight representation learning and weight similarity measure. We extend the traditional hypothesis-testing method to a hypothesis-training-testing statistical inference method to validate the hypothesis on the weight similarity of neural networks. With the chain normalization rule and the new statistical inference, we study the weight similarity measure on Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and find that the weights of an identical neural network optimized with the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) algorithm converge to a similar local solution in a metric space. The weight similarity measure provides more insight into the local solutions of neural networks. Experiments on several datasets consistently validate the hypothesis of weight similarity measure.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2022.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  6. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  8. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  10. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  11. 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
  12. 2017Progressive Neural Architecture Searchcited by 483
3 more
  1. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
  2. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
  3. 2015Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networkscited by 168

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.