Origin Tracer: A Method for Detecting LoRA Fine-Tuning Origins in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, their deployment often involves fine-tuning to enhance performance on specific downstream tasks. However, this customization is sometimes accompanied by misleading claims about the origins, raising significant concerns about transparency and trust within the open-source community. Existing model verification techniques typically assess functional, representational, and weight similarities. However, these approaches often struggle against obfuscation techniques, such as permutations and scaling transformations. To address this limitation, we propose a novel detection method Origin-Tracer that rigorously determines whether a model has been fine-tuned from a specified base model. This method includes the ability to extract the LoRA rank utilized during the fine-tuning process, providing a more robust verification framework. This framework is the first to provide a formalized approach specifically aimed at pinpointing the sources of model fine-tuning. We empirically validated our method on thirty-one diverse open-source models under conditions that simulate real-world obfuscation scenarios. We empirically analyze the effectiveness of our framework and finally, discuss its limitations. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and indicate its potential to establish new benchmarks for model verification.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.
Builds on
16 of 20 references.
References · 16
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 460
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 131
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 128
4 more
- 2023Permutation Equivariant Neural Functionalscited by 70
- 2020Similarity Analysis of Contextual Word Representation Modelscited by 54
- 2022ModelDiff: A Framework for Comparing Learning Algorithmscited by 30
- 2022Understanding Weight Similarity of Neural Networks via Chain Normalization Rule and Hypothesis-Training-Testingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.